Exact Sequences - Lifting Homomorphisms - D&F Ch 10 - Theorem 28

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 10, Section 10.5, Exact Sequences - Projective, Injective and Flat Modules.

I need help with a minor step of D&F, Chapter 10, Theorem 28 on liftings of homomorphisms.

In the proof of the first part of the theorem (see image below) D&F make the following statement:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conversely, if F is in the image of [itex]\psi'[/itex] then [itex]F = \psi' (F')[/itex] for some [itex]F' \in Hom_R (D, L)[/itex] and so [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi ( F' (d)))[/itex] for any [itex]d \in D[/itex]. ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

My problem is that surely [itex]F = \psi' (F')[/itex] implies that [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d)))[/itex] and NOT [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi ( F' (d)))[/itex]?

Hoping someone can help>

Theorem 28 and the first part of the proof read as follows:

attachment.php?attachmentid=69697&stc=1&d=1399873986.png


Peter
 

Attachments

  • Dummit and Foote - Chapter 10 - Theorem 28 - RESIZED.png
    Dummit and Foote - Chapter 10 - Theorem 28 - RESIZED.png
    60.9 KB · Views: 601
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Math Amateur said:
My problem is that surely [itex]F = \psi' (F')[/itex] implies that [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d)))[/itex]

This cannot be true. We know that ##F^\prime\in \textrm{Hom}(D,L)##, and thus ##F^\prime(d)\in L##. But the domain of ##\psi^\prime## is not ##L##, but rather ##\textrm{Hom}(D,L)##. So ##\psi^\prime(F^\prime(d))## makes no sense since ##F^\prime(d)## is not in the domain of ##\psi^\prime##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks ...

Yes, you are right ...

BUT, now I have two problems ...

Problem 1 ... to get [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d)))[/itex] I simply replaced the [itex]F[/itex] with [itex]\psi' (F')[/itex] since we have that [itex]F = \psi' (F')[/itex] ... but presumably I did something 'illegal' ... can you explain my error?

Problem 2 ... How then does it follow that [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi ( F' (d)))[/itex] for any [itex]d \in D[/itex] (given that [itex]F = \psi' (F')[/itex]? Can you help?

Peter
 
Math Amateur said:
Thanks ...

Yes, you are right ...

BUT, now I have two problems ...

Problem 1 ... to get [itex]\phi ( F (d) )) = \phi ( \psi' ( F' (d)))[/itex] I simply replaced the [itex]F[/itex] with [itex]\psi' (F')[/itex] since we have that [itex]F = \psi' (F')[/itex] ... but presumably I did something 'illegal' ... can you explain my error?

If you simply substituted, then you would have gotten

[tex]F(d) = \psi^\prime(F^\prime)(d)[/tex]

Thus ##\psi^\prime(F^\prime)## acts on ##d##. You would not get [tex]F(d) = \psi^\prime(F^\prime(d))[/tex]

Now, by definition, we have ##\psi^\prime(F^\prime) = \psi\circ F^\prime##. Thus

[tex]F(d) = \psi^\prime(F^\prime)(d) = (\psi\circ F^\prime)(d) = \psi(F^\prime(d))[/tex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks ... appreciate your help ... given me the confidence to go forward from there in my attempt to understand projective modules

Thanks again,

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K