Automotive Examination of an automotive crash test

AI Thread Summary
The discussion examines the nature of deceleration in automotive crash tests, particularly comparing it to a capacitor discharge curve. It highlights that well-designed cars utilize crush zones to create a velocity profile that minimizes peak deceleration, resulting in a more constant deceleration force during a crash. This design approach is intended to reduce injuries to passengers by avoiding high initial deceleration forces. In contrast, vehicles without crumple zones would experience a more exponential deceleration curve, leading to greater forces and potential harm. Overall, understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving vehicle safety in crashes.
Bobthefreeradical
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Given { KE=.5M(v^2)} the act of ramming a car into an immovable barrier and the loss in speed from first contact and when the car totally stops, can be described as exponential in nature. Just like that of a Capacitor discharge curve.
is that plausible, or for that matter solid accurate?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Please keep in mind that we do not allow real-world crash reconstruction threads here at PF. But to the extent that your question is general in nature, we should be able to help you with it.

Do you understand how crush zones work on cars? Have you done any searching to try to find an answer to your question? You could probably use a Google search like accelerometer plot of car crash tests to find typical deceleration curves...
 
berkeman said:
You could probably use a Google search like accelerometer plot of car crash tests to find typical deceleration curves...
I refined this a bit by using a Google Images search on accelerometer and velocity plots of car crash tests and got better hits. It looks like the velocity profile of a well-designed car will try to minimize the peak deceleration during the crash, which makes sense. So the profile of the velocity during the crash deceleration is a fairly straight decreasing line, which means that the deceleration forces felt by the passengers is fairly constant during the crash duration in order to minimize injuries. If the velocity profile were exponential, you would have higher peak deceleration forces at first, and then decreasing forces after that. Not very healthy... :wink:

From one of the search hits:

(BTW -- Note that the title of this graph is misleading; the vertical axis is the Velocity, not the Change in Velocity)

1706807176058.png

https://www.researchgate.net/figure...t-car-in-different-crash-tests_fig1_266397454
 
I see, its a function of "crumple zones" & I can guess that without crumple zones a vehicle would experience an exponential curve for its deceleration. Thanks for the info, Sorry about not going on a search for info before posting this.

I was thinking more like a non-crumple zone equipped vehicle, indeed much closer to those theoretical discussion in physics classes . . . oh well . .
 
Last edited:
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top