Automotive Examination of an automotive crash test

AI Thread Summary
The discussion examines the nature of deceleration in automotive crash tests, particularly comparing it to a capacitor discharge curve. It highlights that well-designed cars utilize crush zones to create a velocity profile that minimizes peak deceleration, resulting in a more constant deceleration force during a crash. This design approach is intended to reduce injuries to passengers by avoiding high initial deceleration forces. In contrast, vehicles without crumple zones would experience a more exponential deceleration curve, leading to greater forces and potential harm. Overall, understanding these dynamics is crucial for improving vehicle safety in crashes.
Bobthefreeradical
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Given { KE=.5M(v^2)} the act of ramming a car into an immovable barrier and the loss in speed from first contact and when the car totally stops, can be described as exponential in nature. Just like that of a Capacitor discharge curve.
is that plausible, or for that matter solid accurate?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Please keep in mind that we do not allow real-world crash reconstruction threads here at PF. But to the extent that your question is general in nature, we should be able to help you with it.

Do you understand how crush zones work on cars? Have you done any searching to try to find an answer to your question? You could probably use a Google search like accelerometer plot of car crash tests to find typical deceleration curves...
 
berkeman said:
You could probably use a Google search like accelerometer plot of car crash tests to find typical deceleration curves...
I refined this a bit by using a Google Images search on accelerometer and velocity plots of car crash tests and got better hits. It looks like the velocity profile of a well-designed car will try to minimize the peak deceleration during the crash, which makes sense. So the profile of the velocity during the crash deceleration is a fairly straight decreasing line, which means that the deceleration forces felt by the passengers is fairly constant during the crash duration in order to minimize injuries. If the velocity profile were exponential, you would have higher peak deceleration forces at first, and then decreasing forces after that. Not very healthy... :wink:

From one of the search hits:

(BTW -- Note that the title of this graph is misleading; the vertical axis is the Velocity, not the Change in Velocity)

1706807176058.png

https://www.researchgate.net/figure...t-car-in-different-crash-tests_fig1_266397454
 
I see, its a function of "crumple zones" & I can guess that without crumple zones a vehicle would experience an exponential curve for its deceleration. Thanks for the info, Sorry about not going on a search for info before posting this.

I was thinking more like a non-crumple zone equipped vehicle, indeed much closer to those theoretical discussion in physics classes . . . oh well . .
 
Last edited:
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Carburetor CFM A Holley Carb rated at 500 cfm 2 barrel carb has venturi diameter of 1.3/8". There are 2 barrel carbs with 600 cfm and have 1.45 diameter venturi. Looking at the area the 1.378 bore has 5.9 sq. Inch area. The 1.45 dia. has 6.6 sq. inch. 5.9 - 6.6 = 0.70 sq. inch difference. Keeping the 500 cfm carb in place, if I can introduce 0.7 sq inch more area in the intake manifold, will I have the same potential horsepower as a 600 cfm carb provide? Assume I can change jetting to...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top