Example of conservative and non conservative force

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of conservative and non-conservative forces, with participants seeking practical examples to clarify these concepts. The scope includes theoretical explanations and practical applications related to physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests practical examples of conservative and non-conservative forces, expressing difficulty in finding satisfactory resources.
  • Another participant provides examples, stating that gravity is a conservative force while friction is non-conservative, illustrating this with the example of a ball dropped from a height.
  • A participant questions how gravitational force between the Earth and the Moon can be classified as conservative, seeking further justification.
  • One participant explains that a conservative force produces the same work regardless of the path taken, contrasting this with non-conservative forces that are path-dependent, using the Earth-Moon system and a spring-mass system as examples.
  • A later reply discusses energy curves in molecular binding, illustrating differences between conservative and non-conservative force fields, noting the presence of multiple energy minima in non-conservative fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and agreement on the definitions and examples of conservative and non-conservative forces. Some participants provide examples that align with traditional definitions, while others seek clarification on specific cases, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved in certain aspects.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the classification of forces in specific scenarios, such as gravitational interactions in the Earth-Moon system. The discussion includes references to energy conservation and path dependency, but does not resolve the complexities involved in these concepts.

Ravi Mandavi
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hello frnds, i understand what conservative and non conservative force are but i didn't get it properly with practical example. so any article is there which explain it properly with practical example and in easy way, i searched but didn't get any article that satisfy me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravity is conservative, friction is non-conservative. Drop a ball from a height of 1.00 meter. Gravity actsdownward and the energy change is simply mgh, where h is height, 1.00 meter. Upon impact the ball heads upward. Gravity is conservative, the energy stored in potential gets converted to kinetic, back to potential, etc.

But air friction is non-conservative. During the ball's downward motion, friction (air) is taking away a fraction of its KE. The ball bounces, and the restitution is less than 100%, another non-conservative action. On the way up, friction again takes a fraction of the energy away.

This is just 1 example, there are many others. Did this help?

Claude
 
I got somthing but not fully, if we talkd about gravitation force acting on moon due to Earth then how can we justify that it is consevative force?
 
What does "conservative" mean to you? I've always been taught that a conservative force integrated along a path between 2 points produces the same work independent of the path. Non-conservative forces are path dependent.

The earth-moon system is indeed conservative. The net work from point a to b then back to a is zero. That is conservative. The moon follows an elliptical orbit. The energy at some specific point in said orbit remains the same. As the distance changes so does the energy. But when the moon returns to the same point it was at previously, it has exactly the same energy as previously, no change having taken place.

With non-conservative forces, that is not the case. Take a spring-mass system. An object rests on the floor while attached to a horizontal spring. The spring is stretched and harmonic motion occurs. If the floor was frictionless, the Hooke's law spring force would move the object towards the spring eventually compressing said spring, then the object reverses direction. At any point on the floor the object has a specific potential plus kinetic energy. After several oscillations the energy at each point remains the same.

Now add friction. As the object oscillates, it loses energy due to friction. Spring force is conservative. Friction is not. Did I help?

Claude
 
Yes, now i got it
thanx
 
The following example illustrates the difference between a conservative and a non conservative force field. The two molecules illustrate the same binding site with slightly different orientations. The energy of the bound complex is shown as a function of the bond distance. The energy curve has more than one minimum and therefore the energy minimum is not unique. The maximum energy is measured at the distance of 1.9 Å. The energy curve of a non conservative force field has more than one energy minimum and therefore the lowest energy is not unique. The curve is not straight and the energy minimum is located at the distance of 1.5 Å. The difference in the energy of the bound complexes is small, but it is not meaningful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K