Excitation of optical branch phonons

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the excitation of optical branch phonons in crystals, specifically whether chargeless particles like neutrons can excite these phonons. It is established that optical phonons can indeed be excited by chargeless particles, with neutron inelastic scattering being a notable method for studying these phonons. The role of dipole change, rather than charge, is suggested as a potential mechanism for this excitation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical phonons in solid-state physics
  • Knowledge of neutron inelastic scattering techniques
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic fields and their interaction with matter
  • Basic concepts of dipole moments in crystals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research neutron inelastic scattering methods for studying optical phonons
  • Explore the role of dipole moments in phonon excitation
  • Investigate the principles of electromagnetic field interactions with crystal lattices
  • Study the characteristics and behavior of optical phonons in various materials
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers interested in solid-state physics and phonon dynamics.

valleyman
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
As I studied, the optical branch of a crystal is called so because it can be excited with e.m. fields but I wondered whether it is possible to excite the optical branch also with chargeless particles like neutrons or the charge/action-on-charge is necessary for the process? And if so, why? I explained myself that optical modes are those in which atoms are treated differently basing on the sign of their (partial) charge so the e.m. field stimulates opposite accelerations on them and counter-phase movements can happen. I don't know if this is right, can anyone make it clearer?
Thanks
valleyman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
optical phonons can also be excited by charge-less particles. For example neutron inelastic scattering can be used to study optical phonons.
I don't know exactly the reason, maybe some one can explain.
PS. Maybe dipole change plays the role rather than sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
506