Exergy Analysis of a Closed System

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the discrepancies in the sign convention for exergy analysis in a closed system as presented in "Engineering Thermodynamics" by Cengel & Boles. The user highlights a conflict between their derived equation for δQ and the textbook's version, noting that the textbook uses a negative sign for TdS in its definition. They emphasize the importance of understanding the direction of entropy transfer in relation to heat transfer, which affects the overall analysis. The user seeks clarification on whether the sign convention must be considered when substituting δQ/T with dS, particularly in the context of a system rejecting heat. The conversation underscores the need for careful attention to sign conventions in thermodynamic equations.
Soumalya
Messages
183
Reaction score
2
I was going through "Engineering Thermodynamics" by Cengel & Boles studying exergy analysis of a closed(non flow) system.Referring to the attachment as you can see the equation,

δWHE=δQ(1-T0/T)=δQ-T0/T.δQ

should give δQ=δWHE+T0dS (using dS=δQ/T)

but in the textbook it's given as,

δQ=δWHE-T0dS

Any thoughts on it?
 

Attachments

  • Exergy Analysis of a Closed System.jpg
    Exergy Analysis of a Closed System.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 628
Physics news on Phys.org
I have split the attachment and resized it for better view.Hope it's legible!
 

Attachments

  • EA of a Closed System.png
    EA of a Closed System.png
    46.8 KB · Views: 625
  • Exergy Analysis of a Closed System.jpg
    Exergy Analysis of a Closed System.jpg
    30.5 KB · Views: 641
For some reason this text defines the sign convention such that (-TdS= δQ). You might need to consult earlier chapters to understand why. It is more common to adopt (TdS= δQ)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Useful nucleus said:
For some reason this text defines the sign convention such that (-TdS= δQ). You might need to consult earlier chapters to understand why. It is more common to adopt (TdS= δQ)

I went through the textbook again and it says,

dS=(δQ/T)int reversible

and the direction of entropy transfer depends on the direction of heat transfer i.e, heat transferred to a system increases it entropy while heat transfer from a system decreases it.

Now if I wish to replace δQ/T with 'dS' in any equation is it necessary to take into account the sign convention?

NOTE:The system is rejecting heat and thus direction of heat transfer is such that would result in a decrease in entropy of the system.So for replacing δQ/T with 'dS' should I write δQ/T=-dS?
 
Last edited:
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K