Existence of a limit implies that a function can be harmonic extended

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The theorem establishes that if a function ##u: \mathbb{D'} = \mathbb{D} \setminus \{0\} \to \mathbb{R}## is harmonic and bounded, it can be extended to a harmonic function in ##\mathbb{D}##. The proof utilizes the upper half-plane ##\Pi^{+}## and demonstrates that the function ##U(z)=u\left(e^{2 \pi i z}\right)## remains harmonic. The existence of a limit at ##0## for ##u## indicates that the function can be extended harmonically, as shown through the properties of the holomorphic function ##F## and the boundedness of ##f##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with complex analysis concepts, particularly holomorphic functions
  • Knowledge of the upper half-plane model in complex analysis
  • Basic understanding of limits and singularities in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of harmonic functions in complex analysis
  • Learn about removable singularities and their implications for holomorphic functions
  • Explore the relationship between limits and function extensions in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the use of the upper half-plane in complex function theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, students studying harmonic functions, and researchers exploring function extension theorems.

MathLearner123
Messages
25
Reaction score
4
##\textbf{Theorem}##
If ##u: \mathbb{D'} = \mathbb{D} \setminus \{0\} \to \mathbb{R}## is harmonic and bounded, then ##u## extends to a function harmonic in ##\mathbb{D}##.

In the next proof ##\Pi^+## is the upper half-plane.


##\textbf{Proof}##: Define a function ##U: \Pi^{+} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}## by ##U(z)=u\left(e^{2 \pi i z}\right)##. Then ##U## is harmonic, being the composition of a harmonic function and a holomorphic function. Since ##\Pi^{+}## is simply connected, there exists ##F \in H\left(\Pi^{+}\right)## such that ##U=\operatorname{R e}(F)##. Now, although ##U(z+1)=U(z)## we need not have ##F(z+1)=F(z)##. But ##\operatorname{R e}(F(z+1)-F(z))=U(z+1)-U(z)=0## and so ##F(z+1)-F(z)## must be an imaginary constant: There exists ##c \in \mathbb{R}## such that ##F(z+1)-F(z)= ic## for all ##z \in \Pi^{+}##. Choose a real number ##\alpha \neq 0## so that ##c \alpha## is a multiple of ##2 \pi## (you can take ##\alpha=2 \pi / c## unless ##c=0## ). Let
$$
E(z)=e^{\alpha F(z)}
$$
It follows that ##E(z+1)=E(z)##, and so there exists ##f \in H\left(\mathbb{D}^{\prime}\right)## with
$$
E(z)=f\left(e^{2 \pi i z}\right) .
$$
Now the fact that ##u## is bounded shows that ##f## is bounded, so that ##f## has a removable singularity at the origin. The fact that ##u## is bounded also shows that ##f## is bounded away from ##0## , so in particular ##f(0) \neq 0##. Hence ##u## has a limit at ##0## , since ##u=\log (|f|) / \alpha##. (Since ##f\left(e^{2 \pi i z}\right)=e^{\alpha F(z)}## it follows that
$$
\left.\log \left(\left|f\left(e^{2 \pi i z}\right)\right|\right)=\alpha \operatorname{R e}(F(z))=\alpha U(z)=\alpha u\left(e^{2 \pi i z}\right) .\right)
$$

##\textbf{Question}##
Why the fact that ##u## has limit at ##0## implies that ##u## can be extended to a harmonic function ##u : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{R}##?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's an annoying quirk that you need double # instead of single $ to make in line latex, if you could edit your post to find and replace all instances it would be easier to read
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
876
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K