Expanding a given vector into another orthonormal basis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the inner product of vectors as defined in Equation 9.2.25, specifically addressing the ambiguity in Equation 9.2.32 regarding the basis of the vector |V⟩. It clarifies that the vectors |1⟩ and |2⟩ serve as basis vectors, and emphasizes the necessity of assuming that all vectors are expressed in a common orthogonal basis, represented by the standard basis vectors [1, 0] and [0, 1]. The confusion arises from the author's lack of clarity in specifying the basis used for the components of the vectors in Equations 9.2.32 and 9.2.33.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inner product definitions in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with orthonormal basis concepts
  • Knowledge of vector representation in mathematical notation
  • Proficiency in interpreting mathematical equations and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in linear algebra
  • Learn about orthonormal bases and their applications in vector spaces
  • Explore the implications of vector representation in different bases
  • Review the derivation and applications of Equations 9.2.32 and 9.2.33
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying linear algebra or quantum mechanics who need to understand vector representations and inner product calculations in various bases.

Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53
upload_2018-8-19_18-29-6.png
upload_2018-8-19_19-51-2.png
upload_2018-8-19_19-55-44.png
upload_2018-8-19_19-56-16.png
upload_2018-8-19_19-57-23.png
upload_2018-8-19_19-57-59.png

Equation 9.2.25 defines the inner product of two vectors in terms of their components in the same basis.
In equation 9.2.32, the basis of ## |V \rangle## is not given.
## |1 \rangle ## and ## |2 \rangle ## themselves form basis vectors. Then how can one calculate ## \langle 1| V \rangle ## ?
Do we have to assume that all of these vectors are given in the orthogonal basis with vectors given by
## \begin{bmatrix}
1
\\ 0
\end{bmatrix} ## and ## \begin{bmatrix}
0
\\ 1
\end{bmatrix} ## ?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-8-19_18-29-6.png
    upload_2018-8-19_18-29-6.png
    12.5 KB · Views: 1,604
  • upload_2018-8-19_18-29-42.png
    upload_2018-8-19_18-29-42.png
    22 KB · Views: 629
  • upload_2018-8-19_18-31-30.png
    upload_2018-8-19_18-31-30.png
    26.6 KB · Views: 659
  • upload_2018-8-19_18-32-10.png
    upload_2018-8-19_18-32-10.png
    21.1 KB · Views: 602
  • upload_2018-8-19_18-35-13.png
    upload_2018-8-19_18-35-13.png
    23.9 KB · Views: 689
  • upload_2018-8-19_19-51-2.png
    upload_2018-8-19_19-51-2.png
    14.8 KB · Views: 1,587
  • upload_2018-8-19_19-55-44.png
    upload_2018-8-19_19-55-44.png
    25.7 KB · Views: 4,698
  • upload_2018-8-19_19-56-16.png
    upload_2018-8-19_19-56-16.png
    17.6 KB · Views: 1,277
  • upload_2018-8-19_19-57-23.png
    upload_2018-8-19_19-57-23.png
    6.1 KB · Views: 1,300
  • upload_2018-8-19_19-57-59.png
    upload_2018-8-19_19-57-59.png
    33 KB · Views: 1,446
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The author is assuming that the components of all of the vectors in 9.2.32 and 9.2.33 are with respect to the same basis. They are being somewhat sloppy in their writing, which is probably the source of your confusion.

jason
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pushoam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K