Expanding Universe: Questions Beyond Our Sight

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lnsanity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of recession velocity in the context of the expanding universe, specifically addressing the misconception that objects receding faster than the speed of light are moving backward in time. Participants clarify that recession velocity does not equate to speed in the traditional sense, emphasizing the importance of understanding metric expansion. The linked thread provides further insights into this topic, reinforcing the distinction between speed and the effects of cosmic expansion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmological concepts such as "metric expansion."
  • Familiarity with the theory of relativity and its implications on speed and time.
  • Basic knowledge of astronomical observations and the observable universe.
  • Awareness of the limitations of light speed in the context of cosmic distances.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "metric expansion of space" to grasp its implications on cosmic observations.
  • Study the "theory of relativity" to understand the relationship between speed and time.
  • Explore "cosmological redshift" and its effects on light from distant galaxies.
  • Investigate "observable universe" limits and how they relate to recession velocity.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of cosmology seeking to deepen their understanding of the expanding universe and the implications of recession velocity on cosmic observations.

lnsanity
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Question the thing in the region of space that cannot be seen from us because they recede faster than the speed of light would not they go backward in time relative to us since they exceed the speed of light relative to us ? I know we cannot see it but would not it be true ? or I am missing something ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lnsanity said:
Question the thing in the region of space that cannot be seen from us because they recede faster than the speed of light would not they go backward in time relative to us since they exceed the speed of light relative to us ? I know we cannot see it but would not it be true ? or I am missing something ?

Yes, what you are missing, as you will see if you read the thread linked to in the post above mine, is that you are taking recession velocity as speed, which it is not (in the sense that you are using it).

Google "metric expansion" for more discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
759
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K