Expansion for the prime counting function

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding an expansion for the prime counting function π(x) in relation to the logarithmic integral Li(x). It is suggested that both functions can be expressed as series involving powers of log(x), but the convergence of these series is questioned. The asymptotic expansion for Li(x) is noted to be non-convergent, only providing a good approximation for a limited number of terms. The conversation highlights the challenge of establishing a reliable analytic series for π(x), a problem that has perplexed mathematicians for centuries. The complexities of error terms in the expressions for both π(x) and Li(x) are also emphasized, indicating that proving the positivity of these errors could allow for further refinement.
zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
my question is, let us suppose we can find an expansion for the prime number (either exact or approximate)

\pi (x) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}a_n log(x)

and we have the expression for the logarithmic integral

Li (x) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}b_n log(x)

where the numbers a(n) and b(n) are known , then my question is , what could one expect about the difference expansion

\pi (x) - Li(x) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}(a_n - b_n) log(x) ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless the a_i and b_i are functions of x, no such expansions exist as they would imply that pi(x)/log(x) and Li(x)/log(x) are constant.
 
\pi (x) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}a_n log^{n} (x)

Li (x) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}b_n log^{n} (x)

sorry i made a mistake it should include powers of log(x) and not only logarithm of x , sorry about that.

\pi(x) - Li (x) = \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}(a_n - b_n) log^{n} (x)
 
Last edited:
About what point are you taking this expansion? I don't see a way to take it about the point at infinity.
 
"the expression for the logarithmic integral"

While there is an asymptotic expansion for the logarithmic integral of the form you propose it is not convergent. It is only a good representation of li(x) for a certain number of terms depending on x.

Other series for li(x) that do converge are much trickier. For example Ramanujan's series: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logarithmic_integral_function#Series_representation.

Pi(x) - Li(x) = (Difference of Pi(x) - Li(x)) (see wiki on RH for the best estimate on this) + (Error on your expression for Pi(x)) + (Error on your expression for Li(x))

Note that I added the errors because the sign of the errors is not known. If you could prove the errors are strictly positive you could subtract them.

Of course everyone wishes that such a nice analytic series exists for Pi(x). Many eminent mathematicians have been looking for such a series for hundreds of years with not much to show for it.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
841
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K