Expectation Value of Energy for Nonstationary State in Infinite Square Well

  • Thread starter Thread starter KHU2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the expectation value of energy for a particle in an infinite square well, specifically in a nonstationary state represented by a superposition of the ground state and first excited state. The wavefunction is given as Ψ(x, 0) = C[Ψ1(x) + Ψ2(x)], where C is a normalization constant. The expectation value of energy is established as (E1 + E2) / 2, where E1 and E2 are the energies of the first two stationary states. Participants are guided to compute the expectation value of the Hamiltonian operator to confirm this result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Understanding of wavefunctions and superposition
  • Knowledge of the Hamiltonian operator
  • Familiarity with normalization of wavefunctions
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the normalization of wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Study the properties of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum systems
  • Explore the concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate time evolution of quantum states using the Schrödinger equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, wavefunctions, and energy calculations in quantum systems.

KHU2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
8)
Consider a particle in an infinite square well of width L. Initially, (at t=0) the system is
described by a wavefunction that is equal parts a superposition of the ground and first
excited states:
Ψ(x, 0)=C[Ψ1(x)+Ψ2(x)]
a) Find C so that the wavefunction is normalized
b) Find the wave function at any later time t.
c)show that the expectation value of the energy in this state is (E1+E2)/2, where E1 AND E2 ARE THE ENERGIES OF THE FIRST TWO STATIONARY STATES.


I DID a) and b) , i don't how to do c) , could you help me
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, if \psi(x,t) is your wavefunction, what is the expectation value of the Hamiltonian operator?
 
p.s. you may just do it at t=0, but don't forget to prove that you *can*.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K