Expected value of X*exp(X) for X normally distributed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of the expected value of the expression \( \mathbb{E}\left(X e^X\right) \) where \( X \) is normally distributed. Participants explore integration techniques and transformations related to this expectation, focusing on theoretical approaches rather than definitive outcomes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes the computation of \( \mathbb{E}\left(X e^X\right) \) for \( X \sim \exp(\mu, \sigma^2) \) but does not provide a definitive outcome.
  • Another participant provides an integral representation of the expected value but notes the complexity of the integration, suggesting that common strategies may not be effective.
  • A different participant suggests a transformation of the integrand to facilitate the integration process, indicating a method to complete the square and derive a new mean.
  • One participant acknowledges the contributions of others and celebrates a milestone in their posting activity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the computation of the expected value, and multiple approaches and techniques are discussed without resolution.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the integration of the expression. The dependence on specific parameters of the normal distribution is also noted.

TaPaKaH
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Assume we have X\sim\exp(\mu,\sigma^2).
How does one compute \mathbb{E}\left(Xe^X\right) and/or what is the outcome value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition would say that

$$\mathbb{E}[ X e^X ] = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x e^{x} e^{-(x - \mu)^2 / \sigma^2} \, dx$$

That's a tricky one, I don't think any of the common integration strategies really work.
WolframAlpha does give me an exact result for the standard distribution ##(\mu, \sigma) = (0, 1)##.

Maybe this will also help.

Sorry for the incomplete answer, hoping that this will get you started.
 
Rewrite ##\exp(x)\exp(-(x-\mu)^2/(2\sigma^2))## as ##\exp(x-(x-\mu)^2/(2\sigma^2)) = \exp((2\sigma^2x-(x-\mu)^2)/(2\sigma^2))##. Now complete the square so that you get ##a\exp(-(x-\mu')^2)/(2\sigma^2))##, where ##a## is the exponential of the nasty junk you had to add to complete the square and ##\mu'## has the effect of being a new mean.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 2 people
Very nice one, and congratulations on post number 13,000!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K