Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Medical Experiment with smaller children

  1. Jan 30, 2006 #1
    There has been an experiment with smaller children. First, there was a smaller container which had a certain amount of liquid (Let's say 355 mL, the same as a coke can). Then, there was a taller glass, with the same amount. Without saying which had more, they were asked which one had more liquid in it. They chose the taller glass.

    There was also some experiment where they had to guess which one had more liquid, and then had to pour it from one size glass to another.

    I forgot the experiment exactly, but I still feel this way with certain things. Why?
    For example, Jones Co Soda (The best soda company in the world, in my opinion) makes glass bottles, 355 mL each, with a resealable lid. Now, coke cans have the same amount of liquid. Yet I swear, it seems like the Jones Co ones have more. Is this because of the illusion that it being taller it has more liquid?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jan 30, 2006 #2

    hypnagogue

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    This clearly involves some kind of visual illusion or another. Probably what is going on is that the visual system processes information in such a way as to implicitly assume that taller things have greater volume than wider things (all other things being more or less equal). Another way of saying that might go as follows: if there exists some perceptual estimate of volume based on an object's perceived height, length, and width, the visual system might be inherently biased to give the height dimension more weight to its volume estimate than it does to the length or width dimensions.

    For a more detailed and qualified explanation, you should try to track down the paper describing this study. If you can find the article reference but can't view the paper online, I'd be willing to access the article myself and see what their explanation of this effect is.
     
  4. Jan 30, 2006 #3

    selfAdjoint

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    As I recall Piaget did a lot of experiments like this, and hypothesized that the ability to estimate the relative amount of liquid in different shaped containers, which he held to require a certain level of abstraction, didn't develop until the children were older. Piaget's theories have had a lot of influence on educational thought in the USA.
     
  5. Jan 30, 2006 #4

    hypnagogue

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I haven't found the original paper, but here's a new article (Dec 2005) discussing essentially the same effect: Shape of glass and amount of alcohol poured: comparative study of effect of practice and concentration.

    So it looks as if learning can improve our ability to estimate volumes of various shapes, but even as adults with extensive experience we still tend to be fooled by certain shapes (specifically, our tendency to underestimate the volume of short, wide containers seems particularly resistant to learning). The authors of this paper don't propose any explanation for why this occurs though.
     
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2006
  6. Jan 31, 2006 #5

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yes. Hold that thought...
    Note that, from a single viewpoint, we see objects as areas. Volume is only implied.

    A round glass that is twice as tall really does fill twice as much of our vision. A round glass that is shorter but fatter does not actually fill twice as much of our vision - it only fills root(2) as much. We can't explicitly see the added front-to-back depth.

    Really, the experiment is cheating in a sense. A truly objective experiment would use two glasses that have identical front-to-back depths.
     
  7. Jan 31, 2006 #6

    DaveC426913

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Demonstration:

    2 ROUND glasses, each holds 1 litre

    Glass A:
    height: ~16cm
    Thus, width, depth = ~8cm


    Glass B:
    We give it a height = half of glass A, so: ~8cm
    Thus, width,depth = ~5cm (to hold same volume as glass A)

    Note that Glass A (128cm^2) actually DOES look smaller than glass B (40cm^2).

    A PROPER glass B would be:
    Height: 8cm
    Width: ~16cm
    Depth: ~8cm (same as Glass A)

    In a proper experiment, Glass B would be much wider than it is.
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2006
  8. Jan 31, 2006 #7
    When I worked at a coffee house I generally measured out what I poured into containers with an imaginary mark off point because I was familiar with the containers and approximatly where the proper amount should fill them to. I don't remember having ever tried to observe the actual volume itself.
    This may be part of what happened with the bartenders but I think DaveC has a better theory of the overall issue.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?