Explain why this is no good as a definition of continuity

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
gregy6196
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Explain why this is no good as a definition of continuity at a point a (either by giving an example of a continuous function that does not satisfy the definition or a discontinuous one that does):
Given ε > 0 there exists a [itex]\delta[/itex] > 0 such that |x – a| < [itex]\epsilon[/itex] [itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] |f(x) – f(a)| < [itex]\delta[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There will always exist δ. For example f(x)=0 for x< 0 and f(x) = 1 otherwise. Then your definition will have continuity at 0 using δ > 1.