Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Explain why this is no good as a definition of continuity

  1. Dec 6, 2011 #1
    Explain why this is no good as a definition of continuity at a point a (either by giving an example of a continuous function that does not satisfy the definition or a discontinuous one that does):
    Given ε > 0 there exists a [itex]\delta[/itex] > 0 such that |x – a| < [itex]\epsilon[/itex] [itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] |f(x) – f(a)| < [itex]\delta[/itex]
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 6, 2011 #2

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Re: Continuity

    There will always exist δ. For example f(x)=0 for x< 0 and f(x) = 1 otherwise. Then your definition will have continuity at 0 using δ > 1.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Explain why this is no good as a definition of continuity
  1. Continuity definition (Replies: 2)

Loading...