Explaining Causality: How and Why it Works

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Casco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Causality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Causality is defined as the principle that a cause must precede its effect across all valid reference frames. In Minkowski space-time, this is maintained by the constraint that no object can travel faster than the speed of light, ensuring that events which are time-like separated maintain a consistent order across all inertial frames. In contrast, general relativity introduces complexities such as closed time-like curves, which can lead to violations of causality. For a deeper understanding, Wald's chapter 8 provides extensive coverage of theorems related to the causal structure of space-time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Minkowski space-time and light cones
  • Familiarity with special relativity concepts
  • Basic knowledge of general relativity and causal structures
  • Ability to interpret time-like and space-like separations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Minkowski space-time and its implications on causality
  • Explore the principles of special relativity in detail
  • Read Wald's chapter 8 on the causal structure of space-time
  • Investigate the implications of closed time-like curves in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of causality in both special and general relativity.

Casco
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
What is causality?

Can anyone give an explanation of causality?? Or maybe an article where causality is explained?.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Usually causality is simply defined as the cause coming before the effect in all valid reference frames. For example, if I throw a baseball and knock over a lamp, in all valid reference frames, I should have first thrown the baseball, and the lamp should have fallen over second. In no frame should the lamp fall over and then I throw the baseball.

In Minkowski space-time, this is simple. To demand causality, we simply demand that no object (any energy-mass, or even "classical information") can travel faster than the speed of light. This is because the so called "causal structure" of Minkowski space-time is simply dictated by the light cones which are always at 45 degree angles to the horizontal (in a t versus x graph). For events which are time-like separated, it is a well-known fact, that all inertial reference frames will observe the ordering of the events in the same way (although the time which passes between them can differ). In this way, if I throw a baseball first, and the lamp gets knocked down second, and these events are time-like separated (i.e. the event "lamp gets knocked down" is within the lightcone of the event "I threw the baseball"), in every inertial reference frame (which are all the reference frames "allowed" in special relativity") will see me throw the baseball first and have the lamp get knocked down second. For events which are space-like separated (e.g. if my baseball went faster than the speed of light), then there are always inertial frames which see the events in a different time ordering than me. In that case, we cannot say that the cause always came before the effect, and we call this "violating causality".

In general relativity, this is more complicated. The lightcones may twist around and there could be created time-like closed loops, or causal closed loops in which a particle, always moving "forward in time" (defined below more rigorously), somehow travels to an event it has been at before. This can create whole new causality problems in which (if we can identify a particle's future with it's past) we cannot unambiguously say that a cause came "before" an effect. We usually call space-times with causal structures that contain closed time-like curves unphysical, and we usually restrict our analysis to space-times which obey so-called causality conditions, of which there are a whole heirarchy. If you want more detail, I suggest perhaps Wald chapter 8 where he goes in grueling detail over many theorems and lemmas and propositions which deal with the causal structure of space-time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 456 ·
16
Replies
456
Views
27K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K