Explaining Gauss' Law and Electric Field Direction on a Charged Square Sheet

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field generated by a positive charge placed on a non-conducting square sheet. Participants are exploring the implications of charge distribution and the direction of the electric field in relation to the sheet.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the direction of the electric field, particularly why it is considered to be directed into the sheet despite the positive charge. There are discussions about the nature of non-conducting materials and how they affect charge distribution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on the relationship between the charge on the sheet and the resulting electric field. Some participants are reconsidering the relevance of Gauss' law in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of misunderstanding regarding the behavior of electric fields near charged surfaces, particularly in non-conducting materials. The original poster's question highlights a potential assumption about the direction of electric field lines that is being challenged.

bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain the following?

A positive charge Q is placed on a square sheet of nonconducting material of side x cm in the yz plane. What's the magnitude and direction of the electric field next to the sheet and proximate to the center of the sheet?

I don't understand why the direction of E is into the sheet. If the sheet is positively charged, wouldn't the normal vector be directed outwards?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The material is non-conducting, meaning to say that the charge won't spread out over the surface as it would on a conductor. Since it's placed on the sheet, it stays there and the resultant E field is through it.

EDIT: Why is this titled Gauss law?
 
Sorry, but if it's a positive charge, wouldn't the field be away from the charge and hence away from the sheet?

You're right. It shouldn't be titled Gauss' law.

Thanks.
 
The question asked for the E-field next to and proximate to the centre of the sheet. So that doesn't include the point in space which is not in between the charge and the sheet.
 
Hello:

I'm sorry, but I still don't see. I know that the charge Q remains on the surface and doesn't move. So I would imagine a plate of charge. And a point in front of the plate of charge and near the plate's center. Since the plate is positively charged, wouldn't the field lines be moving out of the plate? And hence the direction of the E field would be out of the plate as well?

Thank you.
 
Well given that the sheet is non-conducting, I'll take it to mean that the charge can't be pressed into the sheet, so you can't say the sheet is now positively charged. I'll think of it as pressing a marble onto a carpet; you don't expect the marble to end up within the carpet.
 
Okay. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K