MHB Explaining Integer Equations: Why -1 at the End?

  • Thread starter Thread starter psc109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts Integer
psc109
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can some one explain to my why an integer equation that starts with 1 has a -1 at the end of the equation.

example:

1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 ... + 2 ^ N = 2 x ( 2 ^ N ) - 1

Conceptually where does the rule come from that there is a minus at the end of the equation.

It starts with an odd number so the answer must be an odd number and that's why -1 is subtracted at the end then how come if an equation started with -5 or -8 you would not subtract the -5 or -8 in the end?

I've seen numerical explanations but they confuse me, can it be explained with words?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Intiger Concepts

psc109 said:
Can some one explain to my why an integer equation that starts with 1 has a -1 at the end of the equation.

example:

1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + 16 ... + 2 ^ N = 2 x ( 2 ^ N ) - 1

Conceptually where does the rule come from that there is a minus at the end of the equation.

It starts with an odd number so the answer must be an odd number and that's why -1 is subtracted at the end then how come if an equation started with -5 or -8 you would not subtract the -5 or -8 in the end?

I've seen numerical explanations but they confuse me, can it be explained with words?

The general formula for a geometric sum is...

$\displaystyle S_{n} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} a^{k} = \frac{1 - a^{n+1}}{1-a}\ (1)$

Setting a=2 You obtain $S_{n} = 2^{\ n+1} - 1$...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Re: Intiger Concepts

Thank you Chisigma, the example you gave does not start with one and does not have a negative 1 at the end.

Why is it there in the the example i was given? Why subtract 1 at the end when if say I started it 8 I would not subtract 8 at the end.
 
Re: Intiger Concepts

psc109 said:
Thank you Chisigma, the example you gave does not start with one and does not have a negative 1 at the end.

Why is it there in the the example i was given? Why subtract 1 at the end when if say I started it 8 I would not subtract 8 at the end.

I confess not to understand exactly Your question, expecially the words 'it start with 1 and ends with -1'... ewerywhere in Math we meet expressions like 'a = b' and no general connection exists between the 'head' of a and the 'tail' of b... may be however that my misundestanding depends from my poor knowledege of the english language (Emo)...

Kind regards $\chi$ $\sigma$
 
One way of looking at it is this: Let S= 1+ 2+ 2^2+ 2^3+ ... 2^n
Subtract 1 from both sides: S- 1= 2+ 2^2+ 2^3+ ...+ 2^n.

The "+1" on the right has become "-1" on left!

Now, factor a "2" on the right: S- 1= 2(1+ 2+ 2^2+ ...+ 2^{n-1})

That "1+ 2+ 2^2+ 2^{n-1} on the right is almost the "1+ 2+ 2^2+ ...+ 2^n" we had before. Make it that way by "adding and subtracting 2^n inside the parentheses:
S-1= 2(1+ 2+ 2^2+ ...+ 2^{n-1}+ 2^n- 2^n)= 2(S- 2^n)
S- 1= 2S- 2^{n+1}

Solve that for S by subtracting 2S from both sides and adding 1 to both sides:
-S= 1- 2^{n+1}

so S= 2^{n+1}- 1

That "-1" at the end is due to the "1" on the left in "S- 1" which is, itself, due to the fact that there was a "+1" on the right in the initial equation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Back
Top