Explaining the Reflection of e^x at y=2

  • Thread starter Thread starter brycenrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E^x
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reflection of the function e^x across the line y=2. Participants are exploring the implications of this reflection and how it relates to the transformations of the function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correct form of the reflected function, with some suggesting it should be 2 - e^x instead of 4 - e^x. There are attempts to clarify the reflection process and its geometric interpretation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on visualizing the functions and understanding the reflection concept, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications that some participants may not fully grasp the reflection process, leading to confusion about the transformations involved. The thread may also be considered for relocation to a different category, such as pre-Calculus.

brycenrg
Messages
95
Reaction score
2
Reflect e^x at y=2


If you reflect e^x at y=0. You just turn e^x negative and it reflects



On my homework it says the correct answer is 4 - e^x
But it makes more sense for me to say its 2 - e^x.
Can someone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brycenrg said:
Reflect e^x at y=2

If you reflect e^x at y=0. You just turn e^x negative and it reflects

On my homework it says the correct answer is 4 - e^x
But it makes more sense for me to say its 2 - e^x.
Can someone explain?
Graph those functions.
 
I did, 4 - e^x is reflected at y = 4
 
brycenrg said:
I did, 4 - e^x is reflected at y = 4

Does this mean you now understand what's going on ?
 
Last edited:
No :(. So if I want to reflect e^x at y = 5 i still do the same thing and add 5 and give it a reflection -e^x.
I don't see it
 
brycenrg said:
No :(. So if I want to reflect e^x at y = 5 i still do the same thing and add 5 and give it a reflection -e^x.
I don't see it

Let's go back to the original problem.
Reflect ex at y=2 .​

First of all, when I asked about graphing the function, I was referring to all three functions.
y = ex

y = 2 - ex

y = 4 - ex

The following procedure may help you understand the correct answer.

First shift y = ex down 2 units.

Then take the negative (take the opposite) of that.

Then shift the result up by 2 units.(This thread likely should be moved to pre-Calculus.)
 
brycenrg said:
No :(. So if I want to reflect e^x at y = 5 i still do the same thing and add 5 and give it a reflection -e^x.
I don't see it
It might help your understanding to think more in line with what's actually happening. You're reflecting the curve y = e across the horizontal line y = 5. When you say you want to reflect e^x at y = 5, I'm not sure you're understanding how this reflection is working.
 
@brycenrg: You need to understand the concept of reflection. See http://www.mathsisfun.com/geometry/reflection.html

Looking into a mirror, you see your image behind the mirror at the same distance as the distance between you and the mirror.

A point P and its mirror image P' are at equal distances from the mirror line, at opposite sides. See attachment. If g(x) (green curve) is the mirror image of the function f(x) (blue curve) with respect to the line y=2, the point P (x, f(x)) and P' (x, g(x)) are at equal distances from y=2, one below, the other above the line: 2-f(x)= g(x)-2.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • mirrorfunc.JPG
    mirrorfunc.JPG
    9.4 KB · Views: 692

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K