Explicit Equations for Implicit Set at (0,0): First Partial Derivatives

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving explicit equations for the implicit set defined by the equations x + y + z + w = sin(xyzw) and x - y + z + w^2 = cos(xyzw) - 1, specifically near the point (0,0,0,0). The user attempts to express (z, w) as functions of (x, y) and seeks to find the first partial derivatives of these functions at the origin. The small angle approximations for sine and cosine are identified as relevant tools for simplifying the equations during the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of implicit functions and their derivatives
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives and multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of small angle approximations for trigonometric functions
  • Experience with solving systems of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Implicit Function Theorem in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about small angle approximations in calculus
  • Explore techniques for calculating partial derivatives of implicit functions
  • Review examples of deriving explicit functions from implicit equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on multivariable calculus, as well as anyone involved in solving implicit equations and deriving partial derivatives.

minderbinder
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the set defined by the equations
[tex]x + y + z + w = sin(xyzw)[/tex]

[tex] x - y + z + w^2 = cos(xyzw) - 1[/tex]
can be described explicitly by equation of the form (z, w) = f(x, y) near the point (0,0,0,0); find the first partial derivatives of f(x,y) at the point (0,0)

Homework Equations



The above bolded part is the part I'm unsure about...

The Attempt at a Solution



I did:
[tex] G = x + y + z + w - sin(xyzw)[/tex]

[tex] H = x - y + z + w^2 - cos(xyzw) + 1[/tex]

[tex] \frac{\partial (G, H)}{\partial (x, y)} + \frac{\partial (G, H)}{\partial (z, w)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x } = 0[/tex]

Then I solved for [tex]\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the note of "near the point (0,0,0,0)" is a clue that you can use the small angle approximation of

[tex] \sin\theta = \theta,\quad<br /> <br /> \cos\theta = 1,\quad<br /> <br /> \texttt{when }\theta \texttt{ is small.}[/tex]

I'm not fully understanding what the question is asking, but I'm interpreting it as saying you need to find

[tex] z = f_1(x,y)[/tex]

[tex] w = f_2(x,y)[/tex]

From there, I would calculate
[tex] \left.\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right|_{(0,0)} = \frac{\partial f_1(0,0)}{\partial x}[/tex]
[tex] \left.\frac{\partial z}{\partial y}\right|_{(0,0)} = \frac{\partial f_1(0,0)}{\partial y}[/tex]
[tex] \left.\frac{\partial w}{\partial x}\right|_{(0,0)} = \frac{\partial f_2(0,0)}{\partial x}[/tex]
[tex] \left.\frac{\partial w}{\partial y}\right|_{(0,0)} = \frac{\partial f_2(0,0)}{\partial y}[/tex]

As I said, though, I may not be properly understanding the question.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K