Explicit formula the nth eigenfunctions of the quantum harmonic oscillator?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the search for an explicit formula for the eigenfunctions of the quantum harmonic oscillator, specifically seeking expressions that do not rely on operator notation. Participants explore various representations and properties of these eigenfunctions, as well as their applications in calculating matrix elements for perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about an explicit formula for the eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator, avoiding operator notation.
  • Another participant mentions that they have only encountered formulas expressed in terms of Hermite polynomials.
  • A participant provides a proposed form for the k-th eigenfunction, suggesting a pattern and including a specific expression involving Hermite polynomials and exponential factors.
  • One participant notes that there is a formula for the integral of the product of two Hermite polynomials, which may be useful.
  • Another participant cites a reference, Schiff, providing a specific formula for the eigenfunctions involving Hermite polynomials and an exponential decay term.
  • Multiple participants express the need to calculate specific matrix elements related to perturbation theory, indicating that they are orthogonal and suggesting that this could simplify calculations.
  • One participant claims to have demonstrated that only for k=1 are the matrix elements non-zero, using recursion relations on Hermite polynomials.
  • A final contribution outlines the matrix elements for the harmonic oscillator, indicating specific relationships between indices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and form of an explicit formula for the eigenfunctions, with some proposing specific forms while others reference established literature. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to express these eigenfunctions without operator notation.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various mathematical properties and relationships, such as orthogonality and recursion relations, but do not reach a consensus on a definitive explicit formula. The discussion includes assumptions about the applicability of certain mathematical techniques and properties of Hermite polynomials.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
Hi,

Is there an explicit formula for the eigenfunctions of the harmonic oscillator? By explicit, I mean "not written as the nth power of the operator (ax-d/dx) acting on the ground state".

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never seen a completely explicit formula, only ones written in terms of the Hermite polynomials [itex]H_n(x)[/itex].
 
I don'T think this would help. In the context of finding the time dependent perturbation to second order, I need to find the matrix elements

[tex]<\phi_k|x|\phi_0>[/tex]

and also

[tex]<\phi_2|x|\phi_k>[/tex]

for all k. :/Actually, there seems to be a noticable patern for the k-th eigenfunction. So far I'm sure of this much:

[tex]\phi_k(x)=\left(\frac{a^k}{2^kk!}\right)^{1/2}\left(\frac{a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4}\left((2ax)^k-2^{k-2}ka^{k-1}x^{k-2}+?\right)e^{-ax^2/2}[/tex]

where

[tex]a=\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Actually, I take that first sentence back. There is a formula for the integral of the product of two hermite polynomial, so maybe this can be used!
 
According to my well worn copy of Schiff, the eigenfunctions for the Harmonic Oscillator is

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2} 2^{n} n!}} H_{n}(x)e^{-(\alpha x)^{2} /2}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
quasar987 said:
I don'T think this would help. In the context of finding the time dependent perturbation to second order, I need to find the matrix elements

[tex]<\phi_k|x|\phi_0>[/tex]

and also

[tex]<\phi_2|x|\phi_k>[/tex]

for all k. :/


Actually, there seems to be a noticable patern for the k-th eigenfunction. So far I'm sure of this much:

[tex]\phi_k(x)=\left(\frac{a^k}{2^kk!}\right)^{1/2}\left(\frac{a}{\pi}\right)^{1/4}\left((2ax)^k-2^{k-2}ka^{k-1}x^{k-2}+?\right)e^{-ax^2/2}[/tex]

where

[tex]a=\frac{m\omega}{\hbar}[/tex]

Use raising and lowering operators! It's a snap to calculate [itex]<\psi_n| x^a p^b |\psi_m>[/itex] for any value of m,n,a and b (integer, non negative, of course) using raising and lowering operators.
 
quasar987 said:
I don'T think this would help. In the context of finding the time dependent perturbation to second order, I need to find the matrix elements

[tex]<\phi_k|x|\phi_0>[/tex]

and also

[tex]<\phi_2|x|\phi_k>[/tex]

for all k. :/

They are all orthogonal. Which gives you a simpler answer...

Some other nice and useful properties:

1) [itex]\phi_k[/itex] is the k-th derivative of [itex]\phi_0[/itex], the Gaussian.
2) They are the eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform.

I did made a number of 3D animations a few years back here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=62227

Dr Transport said:
According to my well worn copy of Schiff, the eigenfunctions for the Harmonic Oscillator is

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2} 2^{n} n!}} H_{n}(x)e^{-(\alpha x)^{2} /2}[/tex]
Yes,Regards, Hans
 
Last edited:
Thanks y'all, but don't sweat anymore on this, I suceeded in showing, using the recursion relation on the hermite polynomials that only for k=1 are these matrice elements non zero.
 
H.O. with angular freq. w, mass m, has matrix elements

<i|x|j>= delta(j,i-1) sqrt[(j+1)hbar/2mw]+delta(j,i+1)sqrt[j hbar/2mw]

Sorry I couldn't find an online reference right now- but it's easy enough to find.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K