Explore the Kaluza-Klein Model: Advantages & Drawbacks

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paweld
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Model
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Kaluza-Klein theory, exploring its advantages and drawbacks. Participants examine its theoretical implications, particularly in relation to gravity and electromagnetism, as well as its compatibility with quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why the Kaluza-Klein theory was discarded, noting its ability to reproduce the action of gravitational and electromagnetic fields.
  • Another participant highlights the issue of unobserved dimensions as a potential drawback of the theory.
  • Some participants argue that the existence of compact dimensions, similar to those in string theory, may not conflict with observation.
  • There is a suggestion that the original Kaluza-Klein theory's lack of a quantum framework may limit its ability to match predictions of quantum electrodynamics, which differ from classical electromagnetism.
  • A reference to a review paper on Kaluza-Klein theory and its quantum generalizations is provided for further exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of unobserved dimensions and the theory's compatibility with quantum mechanics, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the limitations of the Kaluza-Klein theory, including its assumptions about dimensions and its classical nature, which may affect its applicability to modern physics.

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
I wonder why Klauza-Klein theory was discarded. According to the article:
"www.weylmann.com/kaluza.pdf"[/URL]
this model reproduces almost exactly the action of gravitation field coupled
to the electrodynamic field. What are the drawbacks of this theory?
At first sight it looks very promising.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well there is the whole unobserved dimension thing... :rolleyes:
 
Sure, but if the equations are correct ...
 
Nabeshin said:
Well there is the whole unobserved dimension thing... :rolleyes:
That's hardly a conflict with observation, since the Kaluza-Klein theory predicts that one dimension is "compact" (rolled up like the second dimension of the surface of a hose) just like in string theory. I suppose string theory brings up one possible answer to the OP's question--the original Kaluza-Klein theory was not a quantum theory, and so it presumably couldn't reproduce the experimentally-verified predictions of quantum electrodynamics (which differ in some cases from those of classical electromagnetism).

Here's a review paper on Kaluza-Klein theory and later quantum generalizations of the idea:

http://arxiv.org/abs/grqc/9805018
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
719
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K