MHB Exploring Algebraic Sets: Finding Irreducibility and Prime Ideals

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Sets
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the algebraic set defined by the equations Y-X^2 and Z-X^3 in the polynomial ring C[X,Y,Z]. It establishes that the variety V(Y-X^2, Z-X^3) corresponds to the set of points (t, t^2, t^3) for t in C. The ideal generated by these polynomials is shown to be I(V(Y-X^2, Z-X^3)) = <Y-X^2, Z-X^3>. Additionally, it is argued that this ideal is prime, indicating that the algebraic set is irreducible. The conversation seeks clarification on the reasoning behind these conclusions and the properties of the ideal.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Smile)

Notice that in $\mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]$:
$$V(Y-X^2,Z-X^3)=\{ (t,t^2,t^3)/ t \in \mathbb{C}\}$$

In addition, show that:

$$I(V(Y-X^2,Z-X^3))=<Y-X^2,-X^3>$$

Finally, prove that the ideal $<Y-X^2,Z-X^3>$ is a prime ideal of $\mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]$. Conclude that the algebraic set $V(Y-X^2,Z-X^3)$ is irreducible.

Could you give me some hints to solve the above exercise? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Notice that in $\mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]$:
$$V(Y-X^2,Z-X^3)=\{ (t,t^2,t^3)/ t \in \mathbb{C}\}$$

Could we do it maybe like that?

$$V(Y-X^2, Z-X^3)=\{(a,b,c) \in \mathbb{C}^3 | b-a^2=0, c-a^3=0 \Rightarrow b=a^2, c=a^3\}=\{(t, t^2, t^3)| t \in \mathbb{C}\}$$

In addition, show that:

$$I(V(Y-X^2,Z-X^3))=<Y-X^2,-X^3>$$

Is it like that?

$$I(V(Y-X^2, Z-X^3))=I(\{(t, t^2, t^3)|t \in \mathbb{C}\})=\{f(X,Y,Z) \in \mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]|f(t,t^2,t^3)=0\}\overset{*}{=}\{(Y-X^2) \cdot g(X,Y,Z)+(Z-X^3) \cdot h(X,Y,Z) | g,h \in \mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]\}=\langle Y-X^2, Z-X^3\rangle $$

At $(*)$ can we say it like that because we know from $V(Y-X^2, Z-X^3)=\{(t,t^2,t^3)|t \in \mathbb{C}\}$ that $(t,t^2,t^3)$ is a solution of $Y-X^2=0$ and $Z-X^3=0$ ?

(Thinking)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
866
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
886
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
947
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K