What Does Audible Mean in the USDOC Radio Frequency Allocation Table?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Good4you
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rf
Click For Summary
The USDOC Radio Frequency allocation table includes a section labeled "Audible," which raises questions about its accuracy since audible waves and radio waves are fundamentally different. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the term "audible" in the context of radio frequencies, particularly in relation to very low frequency (VLF) signals that can be translated into sound. Participants note that while radio waves are electromagnetic, they can be converted to audible sound through devices like speakers, allowing for the listening of VLF signals. There is also mention of DIY methods to receive these frequencies using simple equipment, such as connecting a long wire to a laptop's mic port. Overall, the conversation reflects curiosity about the terminology used in the allocation chart and its implications for understanding radio frequency science.
Good4you
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
USDOC Radio Frequency allocation table (http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/2003-allochrt.pdf)
lists part of the radio spectrum as "Audible." Radio waves are electromagnetic (e.g. light), while audible waves are pressure waves in a medium (e.g. air.) They travel at very different speeds, and are very different things. We see one and hear the other (depending on the frequency.) An audible RF signal makes absolutely no sense to me. I wouldn't think a government document would get basic science so blatantly wrong, so i think i may be missing something here. If I Google "Audible VLF", there are a lot of hits on the subject. They seem to talk about something like receiving radio frequencies from lightning strikes, and playing them as audio. Or hearing buzzing in electrical lines. Neither scenario i would interpret as being an audible radio wave.

What do you suppose the allocation chart is trying to say? Is it just wrong? Or perhaps correct, but misleading? Or am i completely missing something?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It's just EM at frequencies from 10 -10kHz, plus or minus whatever definition you choose for audio frequencies. Different media obviously.
 
Agreed. An oscillator producing an EM frequency in that range could be heard audibly if you connected to a speaker. The speaker just does the translating from EM to waves of pressure by design. VLF signals are pretty easy to translate to audio since they occupy those frequencies already. I've heard of some folks just taking a really long wire and plugging it into the mic port on a laptop. If you crank the gain up high enough, you essentially create a basic VLF receiver. Ideally, you'd want around 150 meter-long wire for VLF though, but you could probably pick up some interesting sounds with something shorter around dawn or dusk if you're outside away from heavy EMI. HF bands and below tend to be pretty noisy in crowded areas these days.
 
abram said:
I've heard of some folks just taking a really long wire and plugging it into the mic port on a laptop. If you crank the gain up high enough, you essentially create a basic VLF receiver. Ideally, you'd want around 150 meter-long wire for VLF though, but you could probably pick up some interesting sounds with something shorter around dawn or dusk if you're outside away from heavy EMI. HF bands and below tend to be pretty noisy in crowded areas these days

Yup a lot of fun listening to various atmospherics ... Dawn Chorus, Whistlers etc

Dave
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K