Graduate Exploring Huygens' Principle: Odd # Spatial Dimensions & Beyond

  • Thread starter Thread starter pervect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Huygens Principle
Click For Summary
Huygens' principle is discussed in relation to its applicability in general space-times, with questions raised about its homogeneity and whether it can be expressed covariantly. The principle's validity in an odd number of spatial dimensions is highlighted, referencing Jacques Hadamard's observation that it fails in even dimensions. The relationship between Huygens' principle and Fermat's principle of stationary optical path length is also explored, particularly in the context of geometric optics and diffraction. The discussion includes references to various mathematical and physics resources that may provide further insights into these topics. Overall, the thread delves into the complexities of Huygens' principle and its implications in different dimensional contexts.
pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,437
Reaction score
1,600
A spin-off from another thread. I consulted a couple of my GR textbooks on Huygens' principle, and found little. Wiki had a little information, which said that it could be regarded as a consequence of the homogeneity of space-time, and "In 1900, Jacques Hadamard observed that Huygens' principle was broken when the number of spatial dimensions is even.".

So some of my questions are:

1) Does Huygens principle work in general space-times? (Wiki states that "Huygens' principle can be seen as a consequence of the homogeneity of space", but I wouldn't think a general space time would necessarily be homogenous).

2) How would one write the principle in an explicitly covariant manner?

3) In the limit of geometric optics, can Huygen's principle be logically be derived from Fermat's principle of "stationary optical path length" or Hamilton's principle principle of "stationary action"? And what about the reverse? (I ask about the geometric limit because I don't see how one would handle diffraction with Hamilton's principle).

On a related note, I am reminded of Feynman's "sum of all possible paths" approach to QED, I suspect there might be a relation. But I don't want to drag the thread too far afield.

4) Why does Huygen's principle only work for an odd number of spatial dimensions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Before going into curved spacetime look at usual electrodynamics. There you see that it works for massless fields in even-dimensional Minkowski spacetimes. For a derivation, see

S. Hassani, Mathematical Physics, Springer
 
Possibly useful (I haven't read any of it):

http://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...-valid-in-an-odd-number-of-spatial-dimensions
http://www.math.uAlberta.ca/~xinweiyu/527.1.08f/lec17.pdf
http://www.math.utk.edu/~freire/teaching/m435s14/WaveEquationExamples.pdf

http://www.lboro.ac.uk/microsites/maths/research/preprints/papers02/02-49.pdf (brief review)

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/129215/huygens-principle-in-curved-spacetimes
http://www.math.utah.edu/~chu/Talks/HuygensPrinciple/GravityGroup.pdf

https://books.google.com/books?id=R...pg=PA222&dq=huygens+friedlander+wave+equation
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183555741
https://books.google.com/books?id=X6viBQAAQBAJ Huygens' Principle and Hyperbolic Equations - Paul Günther

http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jmp/18/11/10.1063/1.523192
JMP 18, 2125 (1977)
A necessary condition for the validity of Huygens’ principle on a curved space–time - Riccardo Goldoni

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00760104
GRG 17, 15 (1985)
Cauchy's problem and Huygens' principle for relativistic higher spin wave equations in an arbitrary curved space-time - Volkmar Wünsch
(I had an interest in such a question a while back... but haven't really followed up on it.
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!s...ce/sci.math.research/zYMRH6ADAxc/Ba95dnyHy-IJ )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

Replies
82
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
  • · Replies 136 ·
5
Replies
136
Views
23K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
17K