According to general relativity, time is a dimension, one of four dimensions that form 4D spacetime - a structure which is mathematically symmetrical and homogeneous.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Should not all four dimensions, therefore, be mathematically interchangeable? Assuming that we are 3-dimensional bodies travelling through 4-dimensional space, perceiving 'slices' of the fourth dimension as instants or moments in time, surely there should be no reason to favour one particular dimension (the one we perceive as time).

Why, then, in the equations describing general relativity, can't duration (t) be interchanged with spatial distance? Why is there no mathematical framework that allows (as a simplistic example) the multiplication of duration and distance to produce area (dt ⇔ dd)?

I realise that the quantum mechanics describes time as fundamentally probabilistic, in which case this logic would not apply. But why does this logic not apply to the equations of GR?

If, indeed, time and space are separate structures (after all, the law of entropy would imply that time is asymmetrical, placing it at contrast with the homogeneity of space), is there any mathematical proof that this is the case?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Are spatial and temporal dimensions interchangeable?

Loading...

Similar Threads - spatial temporal dimensions | Date |
---|---|

I EM Force not Spatial Curvature? | Oct 15, 2017 |

I Spatial geometry of constant Schwarzschild time hypersurface | Jun 26, 2016 |

I Dark energy and expansion vs gravity and spatial contraction | Apr 14, 2016 |

Questions regarding spatial orientation of event wrt LIGO | Feb 14, 2016 |

Superluminal and temporal effect | Mar 19, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**