• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Explosive Particle and momentum

  • Thread starter TFM
  • Start date

TFM

1,026
0
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A stationary mass of 10 kg disintegrates explosively, with the evolution of [tex]4.2.10^5[/tex] J, into three parts, two having equal masses of 3 kg. These two masses move at right angles to each other. Calculate the velocity of the third part.

2. Relevant equations

[tex] E_k = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 [/tex]

Momentum = mv

3. The attempt at a solution

Okay so I know that this is a momentum question. And it needs to be constant, therefore

[tex] mv_{before} = mv_{after} [/tex]

the initial momentum before is 0, so the total final miomentum also equals 0. this means that since the two known partiles are travelling perpendicular, the third, which mus have mass 4kg, is travelling at an angle opposite, probably 45. However, I am slightly uncertain, since they don't give the speed, although they give with the evolution of [tex]4.2.10^5[/tex] J. I am slightly unsure what this is, do I need to calculate the velocities of the two 3kg particles using the kinetic energy formula and the energy given above?
 

LowlyPion

Homework Helper
3,079
4
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

A stationary mass of 10 kg disintegrates explosively, with the evolution of [tex]4.2.10^5[/tex] J, into three parts, two having equal masses of 3 kg. These two masses move at right angles to each other. Calculate the velocity of the third part.

2. Relevant equations

[tex] E_k = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 [/tex]

Momentum = mv

3. The attempt at a solution

Okay so I know that this is a momentum question. And it needs to be constant, therefore

[tex] mv_{before} = mv_{after} [/tex]

the initial momentum before is 0, so the total final miomentum also equals 0. this means that since the two known partiles are travelling perpendicular, the third, which mus have mass 4kg, is travelling at an angle opposite, probably 45. However, I am slightly uncertain, since they don't give the speed, although they give with the evolution of [tex]4.2.10^5[/tex] J. I am slightly unsure what this is, do I need to calculate the velocities of the two 3kg particles using the kinetic energy formula and the energy given above?
Initially at rest looks like it means the center of mass will be preserved at no velocity.

So ∑ mv = 0

Since you have 3V1 i + 3V2 j for the 2 pieces, then you have 4V3(i,j) equals the sum of those 2.

3V1 i + 3V2 j = 4V3x i + 4V3y j

Where V3x2 + V3y2 = V32

The energy also tells you that 1/2(3)V12 + 1/2(3)V22 + 1/2(4)V32 = 4.2*105
 

TFM

1,026
0
Okay, so would I now I find V1 in terms of the energy and V 2 like so:

[tex] 4v_3 = 3v_1 + 3v_2 [/tex]

[tex] (4v_3)^2 = (3v_1)^2 + (3v_2)^2 [/tex]

[tex] (v_3)^2 = \frac{(3v_1)^2}{16} + \frac{(3v_2)^2}{16} [/tex]


[tex] \frac{1}{2}3v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}3v_2^2 + \frac{1}{2}4v_3^2 [/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{2}3v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2}3v_2^2 + \frac{1}{2}4\frac{(3v_1)^2}{16} + \frac{(3v_2)^2}{16}
[/tex]

Rearrangeing to give:

[tex] \frac{21}{8}v_1^2 + \frac{21}{8}v_2^2 = E [/tex]

[tex] v_1^2 + v_2^2 = \frac{8}{21}E [/tex]

[tex] v_1^2 = \frac{8}{21}E - v_2^2[/tex]
 

LowlyPion

Homework Helper
3,079
4
That's sort of where I was heading, but I was intending that

1.5V12 + 1.5V12 + 2V32 = 4.2*105

Recognizing that V1 = -4/3V3x and V2 = -4/3V3y

1.5(-4/3V3x)2 + 1.5*(-4/3V3y)2 + 2V32 = 4.2*105

2*V3x2 + 2*V3y2 +2V32 = 4.2*105

But V3x2 + V3y2 = V32

Substituting I get 2*V32 + 2V32 = 4V32 = 4.2*105
 

TFM

1,026
0
Okay, I am not quite getting the same answer.

[tex] v_1 = \frac{4}{3}v_{3(x)} [/tex]

[tex] v_2 = \frac{4}{3}v_{3(y)} [/tex]

inserting:


[tex] \frac{3}{2}v_1^2 + \frac{3}{2}v_2^2 + 2v_3^2 = E [/tex]

[tex] \frac{3}{2}(\frac{4}{3}v_{3(x)})^2 + \frac{3}{2}(\frac{4}{3}v_{3(x)})^2 + 2v_3^2 = E [/tex]


[tex] \frac{3}{2}\frac{16}{9}v_{3(x)}^2 + \frac{3}{2}\frac{16}{9}v_{3(x)}^2 + 2v_3^2 = E [/tex]

giving:

[tex] \frac{48}{18}v_{3(x)}^2 + \frac{48}{18}v_{3(x)}^2 + 2v_3^2 = E [/tex]

?
 

LowlyPion

Homework Helper
3,079
4
Sorry, I jotted down the 4/3 without squaring. You have the right equation. I was apparently more focused on the method.
 

TFM

1,026
0
Well, it gives me a nice answer of 300m/s. This seems rather big, though...
 

LowlyPion

Homework Helper
3,079
4
Well, it gives me a nice answer of 300m/s. This seems rather big, though...
Roughing it out V1 = V2 ~ V3

So roughly speaking the masses are moving with similar velocities, which suggests that

420,000 J ~ 1/2*Σ m * V2

V2 ~ 84,000 or

V ~ 290 m/s

This isn't so far from the calculated 239, 319, 319 now is it?
 

TFM

1,026
0
Nope, not too bad at all.

Many Thanks, LowlyPion :smile:
 

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top