MHB Exponential and Logarithmic Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation 2^x = 16(8^2x) for x. The user is struggling to start and has not successfully used logarithms to find the solution, which is known to be -4/5. Another participant suggests rewriting the equation using powers of 2, noting that 8 can be expressed as 2^3. The conversation emphasizes the need to convert all terms to a common base to facilitate solving the equation.
JoeC
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am looking for help solving for x for the question below. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

2^x=16(8^2x)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
JoeC said:
I am looking for help solving for x for the question below. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

2^x=16(8^2x)

What have you tried? Where are you stuck?
 
I don't really know where to start with this.

- - - Updated - - -

the answer to the question is -4/5 but I haven't been able to get it using log or ln.
 
JoeC said:
I am looking for help solving for x for the question below. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

2^x=16(8^2x)

JoeC said:
I don't really know where to start with this.

- - - Updated - - -

the answer to the question is -4/5 but I haven't been able to get it using log or ln.

Welcome to MHB, JoeC! :)

You have
$$2^x=16(8^{2x})$$
(Or at least that is what I assume you have.)

Since we have $2^x$, let's try to make the other power also a power of $2$.
We have that $8=2^3$.
Do you know what $(2^3)^{2x}$ is?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top