I'm reading about the exponential family of distributions. In my book, I have the expression(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex] f(x|\theta) = h(x)c(\theta)exp(\sum_{i=1}^{k} w_i(\theta) t_i(x)) [/itex]

where [itex]h(x) \geq 0 [/itex], [itex]t_1(x), t_2(x),...,t_k(x) [/itex] are real valued functions of the observation [itex] x[/itex], [itex]c(\theta) \geq 0 [/itex], and [itex]w_1(\theta),w_2(\theta),...,w_k(\theta) [/itex] are real-valued functions of the possibly vector-valued parameter [itex] \theta[/itex].

What's being stressed in the few examples available (in the book), is the indicator function. Here's the indicator function:

[itex]I_A(x) = 1[/itex], if [itex] x \in A[/itex], and [itex]I_A(x) = 0 [/itex], if [itex]x \notin A [/itex], where [itex]A[/itex] is the set values the observation or parameter may take.

What I'm seeing, is that the indicator function is inserted with [itex]h(x) [/itex] or [itex]c(\theta) [/itex] whenever these functions are constants.

Do you guys know of any examples where an indicator function is used and [itex]h(x)[/itex] or [itex]c(\theta) [/itex] are not constants?

I'm thinking the whole point of using indicator functions is to make the expressionexactlylike the probability distribution function.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Exponential Family of Distributions

Loading...

Similar Threads - Exponential Family Distributions | Date |
---|---|

I Probability density of an exponential probability function | Yesterday at 12:10 PM |

A Poisson/exponential process with step-wise decreasing rate | Mar 13, 2018 |

Distribution of exponential family | Feb 1, 2016 |

Exponential families | Nov 30, 2013 |

Proving a distribution is a member of generalised exponential family | Mar 29, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**