Exponential Family of Distributions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Mogarrr
Messages
120
Reaction score
6
I'm reading about the exponential family of distributions. In my book, I have the expression

[itex]f(x|\theta) = h(x)c(\theta)exp(\sum_{i=1}^{k} w_i(\theta) t_i(x))[/itex]

where [itex]h(x) \geq 0[/itex], [itex]t_1(x), t_2(x),...,t_k(x)[/itex] are real valued functions of the observation [itex]x[/itex], [itex]c(\theta) \geq 0[/itex], and [itex]w_1(\theta),w_2(\theta),...,w_k(\theta)[/itex] are real-valued functions of the possibly vector-valued parameter [itex]\theta[/itex].

What's being stressed in the few examples available (in the book), is the indicator function. Here's the indicator function:

[itex]I_A(x) = 1[/itex], if [itex]x \in A[/itex], and [itex]I_A(x) = 0[/itex], if [itex]x \notin A[/itex], where [itex]A[/itex] is the set values the observation or parameter may take.

What I'm seeing, is that the indicator function is inserted with [itex]h(x)[/itex] or [itex]c(\theta)[/itex] whenever these functions are constants.

Do you guys know of any examples where an indicator function is used and [itex]h(x)[/itex] or [itex]c(\theta)[/itex] are not constants?

I'm thinking the whole point of using indicator functions is to make the expression exactly like the probability distribution function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org