MHB Exponential Func: Solving ln6=ln2+ln3

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the justification of the equation ln6 = ln2 + ln3 using properties of exponential functions. The user demonstrates the validity of the equation through the identity exp(ln2 + ln3) = exp(ln2) * exp(ln3) = 6. A key point raised is the necessity of the exponential function being strictly increasing over the real numbers (R) to ensure that the logarithmic function is invertible, thus allowing the simplification to ln2 + ln3 = ln6.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic and exponential functions
  • Familiarity with properties of inverse functions
  • Basic knowledge of calculus concepts related to function behavior
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and justifications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of strictly increasing functions in calculus
  • Learn about the concept of invertibility in mathematical functions
  • Explore the implications of non-invertible functions using examples like f(x) = x^2
  • Investigate the applications of logarithmic identities in solving equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and algebra, as well as anyone interested in understanding the properties of logarithmic and exponential functions.

Perlita
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,
I was solving this problem:
Justify that ln6= ln2+ln3

So: exp(ln2+ln3)=exp(ln2)*exp(ln3)= 2*3= 6 = exp(ln6)
Till here, my work was okay.
What I didn't understand is : why should we say that the exponential function is strictly increasing over R before being able to simplify the equation and get: ln2+ln3=ln6 ??

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Perlita said:
Hello everyone,
I was solving this problem:
Justify that ln6= ln2+ln3

So: exp(ln2+ln3)=exp(ln2)*exp(ln3)= 2*3= 6 = exp(ln6)
Till here, my work was okay.
What I didn't understand is : why should we say that the exponential function is strictly increasing over R before being able to simplify the equation and get: ln2+ln3=ln6 ??

Thanks

Hey Perlita! :)

What you need is that the function is invertible.
And a strictly increasing function is invertible.

To illustrate how it can go wrong when the function is not invertible, consider for instance the function given by $f(x)=x^2$.
We have $(-2)^2 = 4 = 2^2$.
But that does not imply that $-2 = 2$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
27K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K