MHB Exponential Functions Problem, find k and a in f(x)=ka^(−x)

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the exponential function f(x) = ka^(-x) for specific parameters k and a, as well as determining x1 and demonstrating a property of the function. The correct value for k is established as 8, while a is found to be the positive square root of 2. The value of x1 is confirmed to be 2. Participants verify the method of showing that an increase of 2 units in x results in a 50% reduction in f(x) by comparing function values at x and x+2. The conversation concludes with successful verification of the calculations and methods used.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am trying to solve the following problem:

In the given graph, we see the function:

\[f(x)=ka^{-x} , x\geq 0\]

View attachment 8053

1) Find k and a

2) Find x1

3) Show that an increase of 2 units in x brings a 50% reduction in the value of the function f.

I have tried solving it, but taking two known points from the graph and putting them in the function. I got immediately that:

\[k=8\]

and than less clear, that:

\[a=-\sqrt{2}\]

In the matter of fact, I got two solutions, a solution without the minus sign was there too, but it didn't match the given points...so in order to solve (2), I just guessed and checked my guess.

I am not sure how to show number (3).

Can you kindly verify that my solution is correct and assist with section 3 ? What am I missing with the multiple solutions for a ?

Thank you in advance !
 

Attachments

  • 11.PNG
    11.PNG
    13.7 KB · Views: 131
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel.

1) $k=8$ is correct. To find $a$, solve $8a^{-4}=2$ for $a$. Can you continue? (Hint: Choose the positive root.)

2) Solve $8a^{-x_1}=4$ for $x_1$. Okay?

3) We'll complete this after the two exercises above. :)
 
Hi,

If I am not mistaken a is equal to the square root of 2.

Then x1 is 2. Correct ?
 
That's correct. :)
 
So...how do we continue with number 3 then ? :-)

I took the function we get, put x+2 instead of x and divided the value of f with x by the value of f with x+2. Got 2. Is if sufficient ?
 
Certainly is. Good work! :D
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K