Exponential Map of R3: A Closer Look

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter enricfemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Map
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the exponential map in the context of the Lie group (R3, +) and its associated one-parameter subgroups. It is established that the infinitesimal generator X can produce a left-invariant vector field and a one-parameter subgroup, represented as r(t) = tX. The exponential map is confirmed to be represented as exp(tξ_X) through power series expansion, where ξ_X is defined as the differential operator ξ_X = ∑_{i=1}^3 X^i ∂/∂x^i. The conversation concludes that while the one-parameter subgroup can be expressed in terms of an exponential, it is not inherently a matrix group without additional representation techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with differential operators and vector fields
  • Knowledge of power series and Taylor expansions
  • Basic concepts of matrix representation in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lie groups, focusing on (R3, +) and its applications
  • Learn about the relationship between infinitesimal generators and one-parameter subgroups
  • Explore the use of differential operators in the context of vector fields
  • Investigate matrix representations of groups and their implications in transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced topics in differential geometry, particularly those interested in Lie groups and their applications in theoretical physics.

enricfemi
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
I don not know whether I was right or not, please give me a hint.

(R3,+) can be considered a Lie group. and its TG in 0 is still R3.

suppose X as a infinitesimal generater, it can give a left-invariant vector field and also an one-parameter subgroup.

but i think, this one-parameter subgroup is not exponential map r(t)=exp(Xt). it should be r(t)=Xt

must a 1-parameter subgroup whose tangent vector at 0 is X, have a unique exponential map?
is there any thing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One-parameter subgroup generated by vector X is indeed tX.

The generator of this subgroup is the differential operator

\xi_X=\sum_{i=1}^3X^i\frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}

which you can get by differentiating f(x+tX) with respect to t at t=0.

Formally the exponential \exp(t\xi_x) acts on functions by power series (Taylor) expansion.
 
Last edited:
arkajad said:
One-parameter subgroup generated by vector X is indeed tX.

The generator of this subgroup is the differential operator

\xi_X=\sum_{i=1}^3X^i\frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}

which you can get by differentiating f(x+tX) with respect to t at t=0.

Formally the exponential \exp(t\xi_x) acts on functions by power series (Taylor) expansion.

Thank you, arkajad! So you mean the 1-parameter subgroup generated by vector field can be not exponential map?
 
Last edited:
enricfemi said:
Thank you, arkajad! So you mean the 1-parameter subgroup generated by vector field can be not exponential map?

It is an exponential. But the point is that what we have is not a matrix group. But, with a standard little trick, we can make it into a matrix group by representing translations as block matrices

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}

Then it acts on R^3 via

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x+a\\1\end{pmatrix}

Now the vector field is represented by

X=\begin{pmatrix}0&a\\0&0\end{pmatrix}

Notice that X^n=0 for n>1. Therefore

\exp(tX)=I+tX

and you get what you are looking for.
 
Last edited:
arkajad said:
It is an exponential. But the point is that what we have is not a matrix group. But, with a standard little trick, we can make it into a matrix group by representing translations as block matrices

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}

Then it acts on R^3 via

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x+a\\1\end{pmatrix}

Now the vector field is represented by

X=\begin{pmatrix}0&a\\0&0\end{pmatrix}

Notice that X^n=0 for n>1. Therefore

\exp(tX)=I+tX

and you get what you are looking for.

thanks, that's a brilliant construct. i think i have finally understood it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
989
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K