Exponential Map of R3: A Closer Look

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter enricfemi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Map
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exponential map in the context of the Lie group (R3, +) and its implications for one-parameter subgroups generated by vector fields. Participants explore the relationship between infinitesimal generators, left-invariant vector fields, and the nature of the exponential map, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the one-parameter subgroup generated by an infinitesimal generator X is represented by the exponential map r(t) = exp(Xt) or simply r(t) = Xt.
  • Another participant asserts that the one-parameter subgroup generated by vector X is indeed tX and provides a differential operator representation for it.
  • There is a suggestion that the exponential map can be expressed through power series (Taylor expansion) acting on functions.
  • A later reply clarifies that while the one-parameter subgroup can be exponential, the context is not a matrix group, but can be transformed into one using block matrices.
  • Participants discuss the representation of the vector field and the resulting exponential map, noting that for certain matrices, the exponential simplifies to I + tX.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the one-parameter subgroup and its relation to the exponential map, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the vector fields and the mathematical structures involved, which may not be fully resolved or universally accepted among participants.

enricfemi
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
I don not know whether I was right or not, please give me a hint.

(R3,+) can be considered a Lie group. and its TG in 0 is still R3.

suppose X as a infinitesimal generater, it can give a left-invariant vector field and also an one-parameter subgroup.

but i think, this one-parameter subgroup is not exponential map r(t)=exp(Xt). it should be r(t)=Xt

must a 1-parameter subgroup whose tangent vector at 0 is X, have a unique exponential map?
is there any thing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One-parameter subgroup generated by vector X is indeed tX.

The generator of this subgroup is the differential operator

\xi_X=\sum_{i=1}^3X^i\frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}

which you can get by differentiating f(x+tX) with respect to t at t=0.

Formally the exponential \exp(t\xi_x) acts on functions by power series (Taylor) expansion.
 
Last edited:
arkajad said:
One-parameter subgroup generated by vector X is indeed tX.

The generator of this subgroup is the differential operator

\xi_X=\sum_{i=1}^3X^i\frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}

which you can get by differentiating f(x+tX) with respect to t at t=0.

Formally the exponential \exp(t\xi_x) acts on functions by power series (Taylor) expansion.

Thank you, arkajad! So you mean the 1-parameter subgroup generated by vector field can be not exponential map?
 
Last edited:
enricfemi said:
Thank you, arkajad! So you mean the 1-parameter subgroup generated by vector field can be not exponential map?

It is an exponential. But the point is that what we have is not a matrix group. But, with a standard little trick, we can make it into a matrix group by representing translations as block matrices

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}

Then it acts on R^3 via

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x+a\\1\end{pmatrix}

Now the vector field is represented by

X=\begin{pmatrix}0&a\\0&0\end{pmatrix}

Notice that X^n=0 for n>1. Therefore

\exp(tX)=I+tX

and you get what you are looking for.
 
Last edited:
arkajad said:
It is an exponential. But the point is that what we have is not a matrix group. But, with a standard little trick, we can make it into a matrix group by representing translations as block matrices

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}

Then it acts on R^3 via

\begin{pmatrix}I&a\\0&1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x\\1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}x+a\\1\end{pmatrix}

Now the vector field is represented by

X=\begin{pmatrix}0&a\\0&0\end{pmatrix}

Notice that X^n=0 for n>1. Therefore

\exp(tX)=I+tX

and you get what you are looking for.

thanks, that's a brilliant construct. i think i have finally understood it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K