Expressing the density matrix in matrix form

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies that the expression of the density matrix as ## \rho = c_1|1> + c_2|2> + c_3|3> ## is incorrect, as this represents a quantum state (ket) rather than a density operator. For pure states, the correct form of the density operator is a projection operator given by ## \rho = | \psi \rangle \langle \psi | ##. In general, the density matrix should be expressed as ## \rho = \sum_i \sum_j c_{ij} | i \rangle \langle j| ##, where the coefficients ##c_{ij}## are complex numbers specific to the state. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between quantum states and density operators in quantum mechanics. Understanding this difference is crucial for accurately representing quantum systems.
Morbidly_Green
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



page1-800px-Lambda-type_system.pdf.jpg


Given the above lambda system, is it wrong to say that the density matrix is of the form ## \rho = c_1|1> + c_2|2> + c_3|3> ## ? Hence when written in matrix form (basis of ##|i>##), ## \rho ## is a diagonal matrix who's elements are the ##c_i##s?
 

Attachments

  • page1-800px-Lambda-type_system.pdf.jpg
    page1-800px-Lambda-type_system.pdf.jpg
    12 KB · Views: 739
Physics news on Phys.org
Morbidly_Green said:
Given the above lambda system, is it wrong to say that the density matrix is of the form ## \rho = c_1|1> + c_2|2> + c_3|3> ## ? Hence when written in matrix form (basis of ##|i>##), ## \rho ## is a diagonal matrix who's elements are the ##c_i##s?
Yes, it is wrong because that ##\rho## is not a density operator, just a quantum state (ket). For pure states, the density operator will be a projection operator,
$$
| \psi \rangle \rightarrow \rho = | \psi \rangle \langle \psi |
$$
In the general case, one will have (for a basis ##| i \rangle##)
$$
\rho = \sum_i \sum_j c_{ij} | i \rangle \langle j|
$$
with the complex coefficients ##c_{ij}## to be determined for a particular state.
 
DrClaude said:
Yes, it is wrong because that ##\rho## is not a density operator, just a quantum state (ket). For pure states, the density operator will be a projection operator,
$$
| \psi \rangle \rightarrow \rho = | \psi \rangle \langle \psi |
$$
In the general case, one will have (for a basis ##| i \rangle##)
$$
\rho = \sum_i \sum_j c_{ij} | i \rangle \langle j|
$$
with the complex coefficients ##c_{ij}## to be determined for a particular state.

I see okay thank you
 
(a) The polarisation pattern is elliptical with maximum (1,1) and minimum (-1,-1), and anticlockwise in direction. (b) I know the solution is a quarter-wave plate oriented π/4, and half-wave plate at π/16, but don't understand how to reach there. I've obtained the polarisation vector (cos π/8, isin π/8) so far. I can't find much online guidance or textbook material working through this topic, so I'd appreciate any help I can get. Also, if anyone could let me know where I can get more...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
63
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K