Extended Extreme Multiple Reissner Nordstrom Black holes

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on equation 10.21 from "Exact Space-times in Einstein's General Relativity" by Griffiths and Podolski, which describes the standard metric for multiple extreme Reissner Nordstrom black holes. The term (1 + sigma(mi/ri)) is highlighted, with a focus on the implications of the metric inside the horizon, which reportedly has a negative sign in the corresponding term. Participants reference related equations (10.20) and (9.21) and suggest consulting the Hartle and Hawking (1972) paper and a 1966 paper by Carter for further insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with black hole metrics, specifically Reissner Nordstrom black holes
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation used in theoretical physics
  • Access to "Exact Space-times in Einstein's General Relativity" by Griffiths and Podolski
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of metrics for Reissner Nordstrom black holes
  • Read the Hartle and Hawking (1972) paper for foundational insights
  • Examine the 1966 paper by Carter for historical context and additional information
  • Explore the implications of analytically extended regions in black hole physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in general relativity, and students studying black hole metrics and their properties.

keithdow
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
I have a question about equation 10.21 in "Exact Space-times in Einstein's General Relativity" by Griffiths and Podolski. The equation is the well know standard metric for multiple extreme Reissner Nordstrom black holes.
It has the below term:

(1+ sigma(mi/ri))

The point ri = 0 is of course the surface of the hole. My questions is the book states "The analytically extended
region inside this horizon has a metric similar to "10.21" but with a negative sign in the corresponding term in the sum, ... " They don't give a reference. Does anyone know how to I derive the above result?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equations (10.20) and (9.21) have (roughly) the same form. The sentence before the sentence that includes (10.20) states "As shown by Hartle and Hawking (1972)". There is open-access to this paper at

http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103858037

A 1966 paper by Carter might also be useful.
 
Thank you sir. You are correct. I am reading it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K