Extended Extreme Multiple Reissner Nordstrom Black holes

keithdow
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
I have a question about equation 10.21 in "Exact Space-times in Einstein's General Relativity" by Griffiths and Podolski. The equation is the well know standard metric for multiple extreme Reissner Nordstrom black holes.
It has the below term:

(1+ sigma(mi/ri))

The point ri = 0 is of course the surface of the hole. My questions is the book states "The analytically extended
region inside this horizon has a metric similar to "10.21" but with a negative sign in the corresponding term in the sum, ... " They don't give a reference. Does anyone know how to I derive the above result?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equations (10.20) and (9.21) have (roughly) the same form. The sentence before the sentence that includes (10.20) states "As shown by Hartle and Hawking (1972)". There is open-access to this paper at

http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103858037

A 1966 paper by Carter might also be useful.
 
Thank you sir. You are correct. I am reading it now.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...
Back
Top