(extended) Page-Wootters formalism

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Heidi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurement
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the Page-Wootters formalism as presented in the paper "Quantum Time" (arXiv:1504.04215). Participants emphasize the necessity of understanding Hilbert space concepts, particularly the inner product and its induced norm, to grasp the formalism. The conversation highlights the importance of foundational knowledge in quantum mechanics, referencing textbooks by Zee and Robert Wald, which may not provide sufficient introductory material for learners. The discussion also touches on the challenges faced by individuals with limited exposure to quantum theory fundamentals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert space and its properties
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of quantum theory fundamentals
  • Experience with advanced quantum mechanics textbooks, such as those by Zee and Robert Wald
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of Hilbert space inner products in quantum mechanics
  • Review the Page-Wootters formalism in detail
  • Explore introductory quantum mechanics textbooks for foundational knowledge
  • Investigate the implications of the norm in quantum theory, particularly in relation to the inner product
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking to understand advanced topics like the Page-Wootters formalism and the mathematical framework of Hilbert spaces.

Heidi
Messages
420
Reaction score
40
Hi Pfs,
I am beginning to read this short paper
https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.04215
(quantum time)
i read things like that on first page:
Ht is the space of a system T (we call it the clock system) isomorphic to a Hilbrt space of a particle on a line. this space is equipped with
coordinates T and Omega (with [T,Omega] = i. they represent position and momentum
they say that according to certain restrictions (which ones?) they can be interpreted as time and energy indicators.
I would like to read your comments on these restrictions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heidi said:
they say that according to certain restrictions (which ones?) they can be interpreted as time and energy indicators.
The projector onto the physical state subspace given in equation (1).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heidi
thanks for the answer. other questions will follow....
 
I do not understand what is (mathematically) the norm in equation 26.
How is it defined?
thanks.
 
Heidi said:
I do not understand what is (mathematically) the norm in equation 26.
How is it defined?
thanks.
It's the typical Hilbert space norm induced by the inner product.
 
I see that you like short answers :smile:
could you give details about the inner product which is used here?
 
Heidi said:
I see that you like short answers :smile:
The answer he gave was perfectly appropriate for an "A" level thread. (Indeed, more than should have been needed--see below.)

Heidi said:
could you give details about the inner product which is used here?
If you don't know what a Hilbert space inner product is, you do not have the background knowledge for an "A" level thread. (Indeed, even your question about the norm does not show that level of background knowledge.)

I am changing the thread level to "I".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LittleSchwinger
Heidi just to say, in a friendly way, if you don't immediately know what a Hilbert space product is it will be very difficult to learn the Page-Wooter formalism. What textbooks have you used to learn Quantum Theory?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Zee,Robert Wald....
 
  • #10
Do you mean Wald's "Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics"?
 
  • #11
I read these books a long time ago. i am 76 years old now...
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #12
No worries!

So if I said the norm is
##||\psi|| = |(\psi,\psi)|^{1/2}##
would that make more sense to you?

With ##(\psi,\psi)## being the usual inner product between vectors in a Hilbert space.
 
  • #13
Heidi said:
Zee,Robert Wald....
That explains why you don't know what is Hilbert space. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and weirdoguy
  • #14
Demystifier said:
That explains why you don't know what is Hilbert space. :oldbiggrin:
Wald's monograph discusses those in some detail so I don't think he can be the reason.

(Zee is another matter, though...)
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
  • #15
PeterDonis said:
Wald's monograph discusses those in some detail so I don't think he can be the reason.
Wald discusses it at a rather abstract and advanced level, which is hard to understand for someone who haven't seen it before at a more concrete and elementary level. If Wald and Zee are the only quantum books that he has seen in his life, it's very hard to learn basics of QM just from that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K