Extended Real definition of Cauchy sequence?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the extended definition of a Cauchy sequence, particularly in relation to sequences that diverge to infinity. A proposed definition states that for any M > 0, there exists an m such that |An+j - An| > M for all n ≥ m, indicating divergence. However, this definition raises concerns as it may classify sequences with subsequences converging to both +∞ and -∞ as Cauchy, which is deemed unacceptable in the context of real numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cauchy sequences in real analysis
  • Familiarity with limits and convergence concepts
  • Knowledge of subsequences and their behavior
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formal definition of Cauchy sequences in real analysis
  • Study the properties of sequences that diverge to infinity
  • Explore the implications of subsequences in the context of Cauchy sequences
  • Learn about the completeness of the real numbers and its relation to Cauchy sequences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators in real analysis, and anyone interested in the rigorous foundations of sequences and convergence in mathematical analysis.

joeblow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Is there an extended definition of a Cauchy sequence? My prof wants one with a proof that a sequence divergent to infinity is Cauchy and vice versa.

My first thought was that a sequence should be Cauchy if it is Cauchy in the real sense or else that for any M, there are nth and mth terms of the sequence such that that their difference is g.t. M and the difference between the nth and (m+j)th terms is g.t. M for j = 0,1,... . But this definition is dependent on whether the sequence approaches + or - infinity.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try this : for each M>0 there exists m such that |An+j - An|> M for all n >= m. This will make a sequence An of complex numbers 'converge' to infinity.
 
That's very close to what I have, except that we are dealing with reals, so that definition would treat a sequence that has a subsequence converging to + infinity and a subsequence convergent to - infinity as Cauchy, which I don't think is acceptable. It is in C since there's just one infinity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
15K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K