Extending an Additive Group Homomorph. to a Ring Homomorph.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on extending an additive group homomorphism, denoted as ##f : R \to R##, to a ring homomorphism ##\varphi : R \to R##. The proposed definitions include ##\varphi(r) = f(r)## for non-units and ##\varphi(rs) = f(r) f(s)## for units in the ring ##R##. A critical aspect involves identifying an ideal ##\mathcal{I}## in the tensor product ##\otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+## that allows the extension of ##f## to a ring homomorphism. The discussion highlights the challenges in ensuring that the multiplicative structure is preserved, particularly regarding the role of units in the ring.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with additive group homomorphisms
  • Knowledge of tensor products, specifically ##\otimes_\mathbb{Z}##
  • Concept of ideals in ring theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ring homomorphisms and their extensions
  • Learn about the structure and properties of tensor products in algebra
  • Investigate the role of units in ring theory and their implications for homomorphisms
  • Explore the concept of ideals and their applications in extending homomorphisms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying advanced algebra concepts, particularly those focusing on ring theory and homomorphisms.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



No problem statement.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose that ##R## is a ring and ##f : R \to R## is an additive group homomorphism. Is the following a way of extending ##f## to a ring homomorphism? Let ##\varphi : R \to R## and define ##\varphi(r) = f(r)## if ##r \in R - R^\times##, where ##R^\times## is the group of units, and ##\varphi(rs) = f(r) f(s)## if ##r,s \in R^\times##...Something about that definition doesn't feel right. Or perhaps ##\varphi(a+b) = f(a) + f(b)## and ##\varphi(ab) = f(a) f(b)##...I suspect that that isn't well-defined...I could use some help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashyboy said:

Homework Statement



No problem statement.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose that ##R## is a ring and ##f : R \to R## is an additive group homomorphism. Is the following a way of extending ##f## to a ring homomorphism? Let ##\varphi : R \to R## and define ##\varphi(r) = f(r)## if ##r \in R - R^\times##, where ##R^\times## is the group of units, and ##\varphi(rs) = f(r) f(s)## if ##r,s \in R^\times##...Something about that definition doesn't feel right. Or perhaps ##\varphi(a+b) = f(a) + f(b)## and ##\varphi(ab) = f(a) f(b)##...I suspect that that isn't well-defined...I could use some help.
There is given a group homomorphism ##f : R^+ \longrightarrow R^+##. This naturally extends to a ring homomorphism ##\bar{f}: \otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+ \longrightarrow \otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+##. To extend ##f## to a ring homomorphism ##\varphi : R \longrightarrow R## we can ask, whether there is an ideal ##\mathcal{I}## in ##\otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+## such that ##\otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+ / \mathcal{I} \cong R##. If ##\pi : \otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+ \twoheadrightarrow R## denotes the according projection, then ##\varphi## given by ## \varphi \circ \pi = \pi \circ \bar{f}## should do the job.

The crucial point is to transport the multiplicative rules form ##R## into an ideal of ##\otimes_\mathbb{Z} R^+##. I cannot see how units help here. They might not reflect enough of these rules, as they are notoriously exceptional in a ring and don't match very well with the given additive structure.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K