MHB Extension of Spring from Mass of 50N

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extension Spring
AI Thread Summary
A weight of 50 N is suspended from a spring with a stiffness of 4000 N/m, leading to a mass of approximately 5.1 kg. The harmonic force applied has an amplitude of 60 N and a frequency of 6 Hz, resulting in a specific equation of motion. The extension of the spring can be calculated using the formula \(x = \frac{F}{k}\), yielding \(x = \frac{1}{80}\) m. The origin of motion is typically defined as \(x_0 = 0\), but this can vary based on the initial length of the spring before the mass is applied. The discussion emphasizes the importance of defining the origin for accurate calculations.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
A weight of \(50\) N is suspended from a spring of stiffness \(4000\) N/m and is subjected to a harmonic force of amplitude \(60\) N and frequency \(6\) Hz.

Since \(W = mg = 50\), we have that the mass, \(m = 5.10204\), and we know that \(f = \frac{\omega}{2\pi} = 6\) so \(\omega = 12\pi\). The harmonic forcing term is then
\[
F(t) = 60\cos(12\pi t)
\]
and our equation of motion is
\[
\ddot{x} + \frac{4000}{5.10204}x = \frac{60}{5.10204}\cos(12\pi t).
\]
Solving the transient and steady solution, we obtain
\[
x(t) = A\cos(28t) + B\sin(28t) - 0.0184551\cos(12\pi t)
\]
How do I determine the extension of spring from the suspended mass? This value would then be \(x(0) = x_0\). Additionally, I will assume any motion starts from rest so \(\dot{x}(0) = 0\) which leads to \(B = 0\) and \(A\) can be defined as \(x_0 - \frac{F_0}{k - m\omega^2}\) where \(\omega = 12\pi\)
\[
x(t) = (x_0 + 0.0184551)\cos(28t) - 0.0184551\cos(12\pi t)
\]
Would the extension of the spring simply be, \(F = kx\) where \(F = 50\) so
\[
x = \frac{F}{k} = \frac{1}{80}\mbox{?}
\]
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Typically [math]x_0[/math] is defined to be the origin of the motion so [math]x_0 = 0[/math]. If this is not the case then, as you correctly stated, the value of A will depend on [math]x_0[/math]. In this situation you have to define where the origin is and usually that would involve knowing the length of the spring before the mass is applied if you want to set the origin at the top or bottom of the spring. Otherwise you have to have some other related point on the spring to measure from.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Typically [math]x_0[/math] is defined to be the origin of the motion so [math]x_0 = 0[/math]. If this is not the case then, as you correctly stated, the value of A will depend on [math]x_0[/math]. In this situation you have to define where the origin is and usually that would involve knowing the length of the spring before the mass is applied if you want to set the origin at the top or bottom of the spring. Otherwise you have to have some other related point on the spring to measure from.

-Dan

I have already solved the problem. I should have marked it solved sooner.
 
How about copying your solution to this thread so others can use it for future reference? :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top