Extra Credit Problem from a past test

  • Thread starter Thread starter shrug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a limit problem involving sequences and the behavior of a function as it approaches a certain point. Participants are examining the conditions under which the limit of a function can be determined based on the convergence of sequences.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the original statement regarding limits and sequences. There is an exploration of whether having two sequences converging to the same limit is sufficient to conclude the limit of the function exists at that point. Some participants are attempting to clarify the conditions under which the limit can be determined.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and examples to illustrate their points. There is a recognition that simply having two sequences may not be enough to establish the limit of the function, and some participants are exploring counterexamples to support their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for clarity in the problem statement, as one participant requests the full question to better understand the context. Additionally, the discussion touches on the implications of defining the function differently based on the nature of the sequences involved.

shrug
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Messed this up.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know. I think you'd better post the full question. I can't make much sense out of that. I can't even figure out what the actual question is.
 
shrug said:
Prove or give a counterexample.
Xn and Yn are two diferent sequences that --> to c. If F(Xn) and F(Yn) both converge to L, then Lim (Fx) =L as X-->c. Didn't get any thing at all. How do you approach this. Or does it exist at all. If the Limit exists then wouldn't it equal L. Thanks

If the limit exists it must sure be L. Just define F by F(Xn)=F(Yn)=L and F(x)=0 else. Then F certainly does not have a limit as x-->c.
 
I think what you are asking is this: if [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}x_n= c[/itex] and [/itex]\lim_{y_n\rightarrow 0} y_n= c[/itex], [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(x_n)= L[/itex], and [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f(y_n)= L[/itex], is it necessarily true that [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow c}f(x)= L[/itex]?

The answer is no. What is true is that [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x)= L[/itex] if and only if [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} f(x_n}= L[/itex] for every sequence [itex]{x_n}[/itex] that converges to c. Just two sequences isn't enough.

For example, suppose f(x)= 0 if x is rational, 1 if x is irrational. Let [itex]{x_n}[/itex] and [itex]{y_n}[/itex] be two different sequences of rational numbers converging to 1. Then [itex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} f(x_n)= \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} g(x_n)= 0 but [itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 1} f(x)[/itex] does not exist.<br /> <br /> Of course, if we know that[/itex]\lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x)[/itex] exists then one such sequence is sufficient to tell us what the limit is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K