Extracting ground state in path integral

Click For Summary
To extract the ground state from the transition amplitude in the presence of a source, the Hamiltonian is modified to H - iε, allowing only the ground state to survive as t' approaches -∞. The relationship derived indicates that |q't'⟩ can be expressed in terms of the ground state |0⟩ and a coefficient ⟨0|q'⟩. There is a question about whether the derived relationship holds when the Hamiltonian includes a source. The final expression shows that the transition amplitude can be reformulated to include the ground state contributions, confirming the method's validity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly handling the source in the Hamiltonian during this extraction process.
geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Suppose you have the transition amplitude in the presence of a source <q''t''|q't'>_{f}

To extract the ground state, we change the Hamiltonian to H-i\epsilon , because we can write:
$$|q't'>=e^{iHt'} |n><n|q> \rightarrow e^{iE_0t'} |0><0|q>=<0|q>e^{iHt'} |0>=<0|q> |0 t'> $$

where only the ground state survives when t&#039; \rightarrow -\infty due to the imaginary term we added. So we have what we want: |0 t&#039;&gt;

But shouldn't the above really be |q&#039;t&#039;&gt;_{f=0}=&lt;0|q&gt; |0 t&#039;&gt;_{f=0}?

It seems what we really need is:

$$|q't'>_f=<0|q>e^{iHt'-if(t')xt'} |0>=<0|q>|0t'>_f $$
 
I can't follow the equations. Please learn the tex symbols \langle and \rangle.
 
Absolutely. I also made some mistakes. I hope this is more clear:

Suppose you have the transition amplitude in the presence of a source \langle q&#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;|q&#039;t&#039; \rangle_{f}.

For example in terms of path integrals \langle q&#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;|q&#039;t&#039; \rangle_{f} =\int [dx(t)]\, e^{i\{ L+f(t)x(t)\}dt}

To extract the ground state, we change the Hamiltonian to H-i\epsilon , because we can write:
$$|q't' \rangle=e^{iHt'} \sum_n |n \rangle \langle n|q' \rangle \rightarrow e^{iE_0t'} |0 \rangle \langle 0|q' \rangle= \langle 0|q' \rangle e^{iHt'} |0 \rangle= \langle 0|q' \rangle |0 t' \rangle $$

where only the ground state survives when t&#039; \rightarrow -\infty due to the imaginary term we added. So we have what we want: |0 t&#039; \rangle instead of |q&#039;t&#039; \rangle, up to a coefficient of \langle 0|q&#039; \rangle.

But shouldn't the relationship we just derived really be |q&#039;t&#039; \rangle_{f=0}= \langle 0|q&#039; \rangle |0 t&#039; \rangle_{f=0}?

It seems what we really want is this relationship:

$$|q't' \rangle_f= \langle 0|q' \rangle e^{i \int \{H-f(t)x\} dt} |0 \rangle= \langle 0|q' \rangle |0t' \rangle_f $$

as it'll allow us to write:

\langle q&#039;&#039;t&#039;&#039;|q&#039;t&#039; \rangle_{f} =[\langle q&#039;&#039;|0 \rangle \langle 0|q&#039; \rangle ] *\, \,_f \langle 0 t&#039;&#039; |0t&#039; \rangle_f

Does the H \rightarrow H-i\epsilon\ work if your Hamiltonian includes a source?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K