Extrema of electrical potential

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the extrema of the electric potential due to a configuration of charges, specifically a positive charge at the origin and two negative charges at specified coordinates. The original poster attempts to analyze the potential function and its behavior along the y-axis, particularly beyond the point (0, 1, 0).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the potential function and its derivative, questioning the correctness of their mathematical manipulations. There are attempts to express the distance from points on the y-axis to the negative charges using the Pythagorean theorem.

Discussion Status

Some participants express uncertainty about their differentiation steps and the resulting equations. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in the differentiation process, and suggestions are made to use numerical techniques or graphical methods to approximate solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of setting the derivative of the potential function to zero to find extrema, but there is a lack of clarity on how to proceed from certain equations. The discussion reflects an ongoing exploration of the mathematical relationships involved.

FS98
Messages
105
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A charge of 2 C is located at the origin. Two charges of −1 C each are located at the points (1, 1, 0) and (−1, 1, 0). If the potential φ is taken to be zero at infinity (as usual), then it is easy to see that φ is also zero at the point (0, 1, 0). It follows that somewhere on the y-axis beyond (0, 1, 0) the function φ (0, y, 0) must have a minimum or a maximum. At that point the electric field E must be zero. Why? Locate the point, at least approximately.

Homework Equations



φ = kq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



φ = 2k/y - 2k/sqrt(2-y)

The sqrt(2-y) comes from finding the distance between a given point on the y-axis and a particle through the Pythagorean theorom. The -2 coming from the fact that there are two negative charges with a magnitude of 1.

Then I took the derivative

dφ/dy = 2k(1/y^2-(1/2(2-y)^(3/2))

Set that equal to 0 and do some rearranging and crossing out.

y^2 = -2(2-y)^(3/2)

If I’ve done everything right up to this point, I don’t know how to solve for y in the final step.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FS98 said:
The sqrt(2-y) comes from finding the distance between a given point on the y-axis and a particle through the Pythagorean theorom.
Note that sqrt(2-y) = 0 when y = 2. Does that seem right?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FS98
TSny said:
Note that sqrt(2-y) = 0 when y = 2. Does that seem right?
I did the trig over and got sqrt(y^2-2y+2) for the distance between a given value of y and the -1C particles.

After doing the rearranging again I have

y^2 = -2(y^2-2y+2)

Which I’m still unsure how to solve.
 
FS98 said:
I did the trig over and got sqrt(y^2-2y+2) for the distance between a given value of y and the -1C particles.
OK. That looks right.

After doing the rearranging again I have

y^2 = -2(y^2-2y+2)

Which I’m still unsure how to solve.
I don't understand how you got this equation.
 
TSny said:
OK. That looks right.

I don't understand how you got this equation.
I think I differentiated incorrectly. I have

2k(1/y-(1/sqrt(y^2-2y+2)) for the potential energy.

I think the derivative is then
2k((2*y-2)/(2*(y^2-2*y+2)^(3/2))-1/y^2)

I’m not sure where to go from there.
 
FS98 said:
I think I differentiated incorrectly. I have

2k(1/y-(1/sqrt(y^2-2y+2)) for the potential energy.

I think the derivative is then
2k((2*y-2)/(2*(y^2-2*y+2)^(3/2))-1/y^2)
OK. I think that's right.

I’m not sure where to go from there.
As you noted in your first post, you should set this equal to zero and solve for y. I believe you will only be able to get an approximate solution by using some numerical technique or by using a graph.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K