Extrema of Functions of Two Variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding critical points and testing for relative extrema of the function f(x, y) = (x - 1)²(y + 4)². The critical points identified are (1, 0) and (0, -4). The Second Partials Test fails, indicating that there are no relative extrema, but rather absolute minima at the critical lines defined by (1, a, 0) and (b, -4, 0). The distinction between absolute minima and relative extrema is clarified, emphasizing that absolute minima are points where no other point in the domain has a lower function value.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and critical points
  • Familiarity with the Second Partials Test in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of absolute and relative extrema definitions
  • Basic graphing skills for visualizing functions of two variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Second Partials Test in different functions
  • Learn about the implications of critical points in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the graphical representation of functions to identify extrema visually
  • Investigate the differences between local and global extrema in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians analyzing functions of multiple variables, and anyone interested in optimization problems in mathematics.

harpazo
Messages
208
Reaction score
16
Find the critical points and test for relative extrema. List the critical points for which the Second Partials Test fails.

Given: f (x, y) = (x - 1)^2 (y + 4)^2

I found the partial derivative for x and y to be the following:

f_x = 2 (x - 1)(y + y)^2

f_y = 2 (y + 4)(x - 1)^2

I solved for x and y by setting f_x and f_y to 0.

I then found the critical points to be (1, 0) and (0, -4).

I evaluated f (x, y) at each critical point to find the relative minima. My answer for relative minima is the point
in space (0, -4, 0).

I found that the Second Partials Test fails.

The textbook's answer reveals that the Second Partials Test fails in this case. However, the textbook also reveals that there is no relative extrema but rather absolute minima at (1, a, 0) and (b, -4, 0).

1. Why is the answer an ABSOLUTE MINIMA and not a RELATIVE EXTREMA?

2. In Terms of the absolute MINIMA, where do the letters a and b come from or can it simply be a textbook typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Harpazo said:
Find the critical points and test for relative extrema. List the critical points for which the Second Partials Test fails.

Given: f (x, y) = (x - 1)^2 (y + 4)^2

I found the partial derivative for x and y to be the following:

f_x = 2 (x - 1)(y + y)^2

f_y = 2 (y + 4)(x - 1)^2

I solved for x and y by setting f_x and f_y to 0.

I then found the critical points to be (1, 0) and (0, -4).

I evaluated f (x, y) at each critical point to find the relative minima. My answer for relative minima is the point
in space (0, -4, 0).

I found that the Second Partials Test fails.

The textbook's answer reveals that the Second Partials Test fails in this case. However, the textbook also reveals that there is no relative extrema but rather absolute minima at (1, a, 0) and (b, -4, 0).

1. Why is the answer an ABSOLUTE MINIMA and not a RELATIVE EXTREMA?

2. In Terms of the absolute MINIMA, where do the letters a and b come from or can it simply be a textbook typo?

Hi Harpazo! (Smile)

When we fill in $x=1$, we get $f_x=f_y=0$, regardless of the value of $y$.
So every point with $x=1$ is a critical point - it's a vertical line.
And we have $f(x,y)=0$ at every point of that line.

Let's pick an arbitrary $y$-coordinate, say, $a$.
Then we effectively have the parametrized line $(x,y,z)=(1,a,0)$ with parameter $a$.

Similarly, the line $(x,y,z)=(b,-4,0)$ consists of critical points as well.

And yes, the second partial test fails, but we can still take a look at what the function looks like.
The function is a product of squares. That means it's either positive or zero.
It looks like:
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{pgfplots}
\begin{axis}[ymin=-8]
\addplot[blue, ultra thick, domain=-7:4] (1, x);
\addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,-4);
\node at (axis cs:-2,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:-2,-6) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,-6) {+};
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}
In other words, those critical lines are absolute minima of the surface $z=f(x,y)$.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Harpazo! (Smile)

When we fill in $x=1$, we get $f_x=f_y=0$, regardless of the value of $y$.
So every point with $x=1$ is a critical point - it's a vertical line.
And we have $f(x,y)=0$ at every point of that line.

Let's pick an arbitrary $y$-coordinate, say, $a$.
Then we effectively have the parametrized line $(x,y,z)=(1,a,0)$ with parameter $a$.

Similarly, the line $(x,y,z)=(b,-4,0)$ consists of critical points as well.

And yes, the second partial test fails, but we can still take a look at what the function looks like.
The function is a product of squares. That means it's either positive or zero.
It looks like:
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{pgfplots}
\begin{axis}[ymin=-8]
\addplot[blue, ultra thick, domain=-7:4] (1, x);
\addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,-4);
\node at (axis cs:-2,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:-2,-6) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,-6) {+};
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}
In other words, those critical lines are absolute minima of the surface $f(x,y)=0$.

Great reply. I need you to simply define relative extrema and absolute minima. Also, what is the difference between relative extrema and absolute extrema?
 
Harpazo said:
Great reply. I need you to simply define relative extrema and absolute minima. Also, what is the difference between relative extrema and absolute extrema?

A relative (or local) extremum is a point where all points "closeby" either have function values that are all greater (relative minimum), or all less (relative maximum).
An absolute extremum is a point such that no other point in the domain has a greater function value (absolute minimum) respectively lower (absolute maximum).

A critical point is a "candidate" for a relative extremum.
And each relative extremum is a "candidate" for an absolute extremum.
 
I like Serena said:
A relative (or local) extremum is a point where all points "closeby" are either have function values that are all greater (relative minimum), or are all less (relative maximum).
An absolute extremum is a point such that no other point in the domain has a greater function value (absolute minimum) respectively lower (absolute maximum).

A critical point is a "candidate" for a relative extremum.
And each relative extremum is a "candidate" for an absolute extremum.

Good information. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K