Extrema of Functions of Two Variables

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding critical points and testing for relative extrema of the function f(x, y) = (x - 1)^2 (y + 4)^2. Participants explore the implications of the Second Partials Test and the nature of extrema, including the distinction between relative and absolute minima.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants found critical points at (1, 0) and (0, -4) by setting the partial derivatives f_x and f_y to zero.
  • There is a claim that the Second Partials Test fails, leading to a discussion about the nature of extrema, with some asserting that there are absolute minima rather than relative extrema.
  • One participant suggests that every point along the line x=1 is a critical point, indicating a vertical line of critical points where f(x, y) = 0.
  • Participants question the notation of 'a' and 'b' in the context of absolute minima, with suggestions that it may be a typo in the textbook.
  • Definitions of relative and absolute extrema are provided, noting that a relative extremum is a local minimum or maximum, while an absolute extremum is the overall minimum or maximum across the entire domain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the nature of the extrema, with some participants asserting the existence of absolute minima while others engage in clarifying definitions and implications of the Second Partials Test.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various interpretations of the results and the implications of the Second Partials Test, with some mathematical steps and assumptions remaining unresolved.

harpazo
Messages
208
Reaction score
16
Find the critical points and test for relative extrema. List the critical points for which the Second Partials Test fails.

Given: f (x, y) = (x - 1)^2 (y + 4)^2

I found the partial derivative for x and y to be the following:

f_x = 2 (x - 1)(y + y)^2

f_y = 2 (y + 4)(x - 1)^2

I solved for x and y by setting f_x and f_y to 0.

I then found the critical points to be (1, 0) and (0, -4).

I evaluated f (x, y) at each critical point to find the relative minima. My answer for relative minima is the point
in space (0, -4, 0).

I found that the Second Partials Test fails.

The textbook's answer reveals that the Second Partials Test fails in this case. However, the textbook also reveals that there is no relative extrema but rather absolute minima at (1, a, 0) and (b, -4, 0).

1. Why is the answer an ABSOLUTE MINIMA and not a RELATIVE EXTREMA?

2. In Terms of the absolute MINIMA, where do the letters a and b come from or can it simply be a textbook typo?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Harpazo said:
Find the critical points and test for relative extrema. List the critical points for which the Second Partials Test fails.

Given: f (x, y) = (x - 1)^2 (y + 4)^2

I found the partial derivative for x and y to be the following:

f_x = 2 (x - 1)(y + y)^2

f_y = 2 (y + 4)(x - 1)^2

I solved for x and y by setting f_x and f_y to 0.

I then found the critical points to be (1, 0) and (0, -4).

I evaluated f (x, y) at each critical point to find the relative minima. My answer for relative minima is the point
in space (0, -4, 0).

I found that the Second Partials Test fails.

The textbook's answer reveals that the Second Partials Test fails in this case. However, the textbook also reveals that there is no relative extrema but rather absolute minima at (1, a, 0) and (b, -4, 0).

1. Why is the answer an ABSOLUTE MINIMA and not a RELATIVE EXTREMA?

2. In Terms of the absolute MINIMA, where do the letters a and b come from or can it simply be a textbook typo?

Hi Harpazo! (Smile)

When we fill in $x=1$, we get $f_x=f_y=0$, regardless of the value of $y$.
So every point with $x=1$ is a critical point - it's a vertical line.
And we have $f(x,y)=0$ at every point of that line.

Let's pick an arbitrary $y$-coordinate, say, $a$.
Then we effectively have the parametrized line $(x,y,z)=(1,a,0)$ with parameter $a$.

Similarly, the line $(x,y,z)=(b,-4,0)$ consists of critical points as well.

And yes, the second partial test fails, but we can still take a look at what the function looks like.
The function is a product of squares. That means it's either positive or zero.
It looks like:
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{pgfplots}
\begin{axis}[ymin=-8]
\addplot[blue, ultra thick, domain=-7:4] (1, x);
\addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,-4);
\node at (axis cs:-2,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:-2,-6) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,-6) {+};
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}
In other words, those critical lines are absolute minima of the surface $z=f(x,y)$.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Harpazo! (Smile)

When we fill in $x=1$, we get $f_x=f_y=0$, regardless of the value of $y$.
So every point with $x=1$ is a critical point - it's a vertical line.
And we have $f(x,y)=0$ at every point of that line.

Let's pick an arbitrary $y$-coordinate, say, $a$.
Then we effectively have the parametrized line $(x,y,z)=(1,a,0)$ with parameter $a$.

Similarly, the line $(x,y,z)=(b,-4,0)$ consists of critical points as well.

And yes, the second partial test fails, but we can still take a look at what the function looks like.
The function is a product of squares. That means it's either positive or zero.
It looks like:
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{pgfplots}
\begin{axis}[ymin=-8]
\addplot[blue, ultra thick, domain=-7:4] (1, x);
\addplot[blue, ultra thick] (x,-4);
\node at (axis cs:-2,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,0) {+};
\node at (axis cs:-2,-6) {+};
\node at (axis cs:3,-6) {+};
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}
In other words, those critical lines are absolute minima of the surface $f(x,y)=0$.

Great reply. I need you to simply define relative extrema and absolute minima. Also, what is the difference between relative extrema and absolute extrema?
 
Harpazo said:
Great reply. I need you to simply define relative extrema and absolute minima. Also, what is the difference between relative extrema and absolute extrema?

A relative (or local) extremum is a point where all points "closeby" either have function values that are all greater (relative minimum), or all less (relative maximum).
An absolute extremum is a point such that no other point in the domain has a greater function value (absolute minimum) respectively lower (absolute maximum).

A critical point is a "candidate" for a relative extremum.
And each relative extremum is a "candidate" for an absolute extremum.
 
I like Serena said:
A relative (or local) extremum is a point where all points "closeby" are either have function values that are all greater (relative minimum), or are all less (relative maximum).
An absolute extremum is a point such that no other point in the domain has a greater function value (absolute minimum) respectively lower (absolute maximum).

A critical point is a "candidate" for a relative extremum.
And each relative extremum is a "candidate" for an absolute extremum.

Good information. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K