Extremely high energy density batteries?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the exploration of high energy density batteries, specifically those that could theoretically utilize nuclear decay processes instead of traditional chemical oxidation and reduction methods. Participants reference the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (RTG), which has been used for remote power generation and satellite applications, but emphasize that such nuclear-based energy storage is not feasible for general use due to cost and safety concerns. The conversation concludes that while the concept of a battery based on particle decay is intriguing, it remains theoretical and not currently possible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy storage concepts
  • Familiarity with Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs)
  • Knowledge of electrochemical cells and battery technology
  • Basic principles of nuclear physics and decay processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles and applications of Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs)
  • Explore advancements in energy storage technologies beyond chemical batteries
  • Investigate theoretical models for nuclear-based energy storage systems
  • Learn about safety regulations and challenges associated with nuclear energy applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and technology enthusiasts interested in advanced energy storage solutions, particularly those exploring the potential of nuclear energy applications in battery technology.

jerich1000
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Are there articles written on exotic, ultimate batteries? I'm not referring to those for hybrid cars, but those that have energy densities up to that of nuclear fuels or higher.

Rather than batteries that operate via chemical oxidation and reduction, is there a theoretical type of battery that provides energy resulting from the decay of certain particles, and the recharging of the battery would be to reverse that process.

Obviously such batteries are not used today because of cost or other reasons.

Could any of you give me some links?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator. They were pretty popular in the 50's and 60's for remote power generation. The US has since cleaned up most of theirs, but the Russian government seems to have lost track of more than a few. They remain pretty popular for powering satellites.
 
First, let me say that a Battery is an array of electrochemical cells. Other devices that do not use electrochemical cells are not batteries. However let us assume that you meant energy storage devices.

A fairly good overview of energy storage can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_storage

Note that none of the examples in that article are nuclear. That simply isn't an option expect in extreme situations, such as spacecraft .
Rather than batteries that operate via chemical oxidation and reduction, is there a theoretical type of battery that provides energy resulting from the decay of certain particles, and the recharging of the battery would be to reverse that process.

To my knowledge this is not possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K