How do I calculate the work done by a force field using the dot product?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by a force field using the dot product, specifically addressing the equation for infinitesimal work, \(dW = F_x dx + F_y dy\). Participants clarify that the force components must be derived from the magnitude of the force and its tangential relationship to the path. The correct formulation for work involves integrating the expression \(dW = F \sqrt{(dx)^2 + (dy)^2}\), leading to the correct answer of 257 J. The key error identified was in the initial misunderstanding of how to express the force components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus and force fields
  • Familiarity with the concept of work in physics
  • Knowledge of integration techniques
  • Ability to differentiate and manipulate trigonometric functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of work done by a force field using vector calculus
  • Learn about the relationship between force components and their magnitudes
  • Explore integration techniques for calculating work in non-linear paths
  • Investigate the application of the dot product in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as engineers and mathematicians dealing with force fields and work calculations.

annamal
Messages
393
Reaction score
33
Homework Statement
A particle moves along a curved path y = 10*(1 + cos(0.1*x))
from x = 0 to x = 10*pi subject to a tangential force of variable magnitude F = 10*sin(0.1*x)
How much work does the force do?
Relevant Equations
F dot product dr = dW
y = 10*(1 + cos(0.1*x)) --> dy/dx = -sin(0.1x)
dW = F*dx + F*dy = 10*sin(0.1*x)dx + 10*sin(0.1*x)*-sin(0.1x)
integrating we have -100*cos(0.1*x) -10*sin(0.1x)^2 from 0 to 10*pi = W = 43 J. The answer says 257 J. Where am I wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have taken both x- and y-components of the force to be equal to the magnitude of the force.
 
Yes, how would I split F(x) into x and y components?

I also tried
dW = xdx + F(x)*dy and didn't get the right answer either.
 
annamal said:
Yes, how would I split F(x) into x and y components?

I also tried
dW = xdx + F(x)*dy and didn't get the right answer either.
Ask yourself if you need to know the components.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu
Orodruin said:
Ask yourself if you need to know the components.
I don't know. The only way I wouldn't need the know the components is with |F||r|cos(theta) = |F||r| = F(x)*(sqrt(y^2 + x^2))??
 
Almost. But it is not ##\vec F\cdot \vec x##, it is ##\vec F \cdot d\vec x## ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
annamal said:
I don't know. The only way I wouldn't need the know the components is with |F||r|cos(theta) = |F||r| = F(x)*(sqrt(y^2 + x^2))??
The problem statement does say something about how the force is related to the path, doesn't it ?
 
SammyS said:
The problem statement does say something about how the force is related to the path, doesn't it ?
Yes, only with x though F = 10*sin(0.1*x). Still don't know how to figure this problem out.
 
annamal said:
Yes, only with x though F = 10*sin(0.1*x). Still don't know how to figure this problem out.
If it moves dx along the x axis, how far does it move, approximately, in the y direction? What is that movement as a vector?
What is the corresponding vector form of the force?
How much work is done?
 
  • #10
It says the force is tangential to the path. Therefore the infinitesimal work dW is equal to the magnitude of the force multiplied by the infinitesimal length dr (no need to take vectors and dot products).Therefore $$dW=Fdr=F\sqrt{dy^2+dx^2}$$

Now replace $$dy=-\sin (0.1x) dx$$ in the above equation and then calculate $$W=\int dW$$

If you want to know where you are wrong, it is in the equation for the infinitesimal work ##dW##. It is $$dW=F_xdx+F_ydy$$ and it is a mini trouble to calculate the components of the force ##F_x,F_y## from the data of the magnitude of the force and from being tangential to the given path.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #11
Orodruin said:
Almost. But it is not ##\vec F\cdot \vec x##, it is ##\vec F \cdot d\vec x## ...
In order to be perfectly consistent with the notation already used, you should have said "not ##\vec F\cdot \vec r## but ##\vec F\cdot d\vec r##" where ##\vec r## the position vector ##\vec r=x\hat x+y\hat y## and ##d\vec r=dx\hat x+dy\hat y##.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
It seems to me that the integral can be set up quite easily by noting that ##\vec F## is in the same direction as the tangential element ##d\vec s## in which case $$dW=F~ds=F\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dy)^2}=Fdx\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2}.$$Doing the ensuing integral is a task in itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: annamal, Delta2, SammyS and 1 other person
  • #13
kuruman said:
It seems to me that the integral can be set up quite easily by noting that ##\vec F## is in the same direction as the tangential element ##d\vec s## in which case $$dW=F~ds=F\sqrt{(dx)^2+(dy)^2}=Fdx\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2}.$$Doing the ensuing integral is a task in itself.
Yes that leads to the correct answer. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K