Calculating Work with Vector Components and Variable Force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating work done by a variable force represented by the vector F = x^i + xy^j. The original poster is tasked with finding the work done as an object moves along different paths from the origin (0,0) to the point (1,2), first along the x-axis and then vertically, and finally diagonally.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate work using line integrals for different paths and expresses uncertainty about the correct approach for the second part of the problem. Some participants suggest setting x to 1 for the vertical movement, while others discuss the implications of using different paths on the work done.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different methods for calculating work and questioning the assumptions regarding the nature of the force. There is recognition that the force is not conservative, which affects the work done along different paths.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the force being non-conservative and how it affects the work calculated for different paths taken by the object.

Chansu
Hello all!

I usually don't like to ask for help... But this is the first week of courses and I'm already stumped on a homework question...

1. Homework Statement
So the question states: Find the work by the force F = x^i + xy^j. If the object starts from the origin (0,0), moves along the x-axis to the point (1,0) then moves in the y direction to point (1,2). Find the work if instead, the object moves diagonally from the origin to (1,2).

F = x^i + xy^j

2. Homework Equations

W = ∫ F ⋅ ds

rise = Slope
run

3. The Attempt at a Solution

Part 1:
First I found the work from the origin to (1,0):

W1 = ∫ (x^i + xy^j) ⋅ (dx^i + 0^j)

= ∫ x dx + 0

= ½ x2 (from 0 to 1)

= ½ (1)2 - ½ (0)2

= ½



Then from (1,0) to (1,2):

W2 = ∫ (x^i + xy^j) ⋅ (0^i + dy^j)

= ∫ (xy) dy + 0

This is where things get hard for me... I've talked to my professor a couple times but I forgot what he said about this part. He said to either solve for x in terms of y and slope; or to set the x to 1 since it is already at (1,0) and does not move on the x-axis. So I'll just use the one i went with on my paper (x = y/2)

= ∫ (y2/2) dy + 0

= ½ (⅓ y3 (from 0 to 2)

= ½ (⅓ 23 - ½ (⅓ 03

= 4/3

Wtotal = ½ + 4/3

For part 2:
From origin (0,0) to final position (1,2)

W = ∫ (x^i + xy^j) ⋅ (dx^i + dy^j)

= ∫ x dx + ∫ (xy) dy

= ½ x2 (from 0 to 1) + ½ (⅓ y3 (from 0 to 2)

= ½ + ¾Is this correct? What should I change? Thank you for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Chansu said:
This is where things get hard for me... I've talked to my professor a couple times but I forgot what he said about this part. He said to either solve for x in terms of y and slope; or to set the x to 1 since it is already at (1,0) and does not move on the x-axis. So I'll just use the one i went with on my paper (x = y/2)
You should just set ##x=1## since that is the equation of a line pointing straight up. What you did in the second part looks right though.
 
NFuller said:
You should just set ##x=1## since that is the equation of a line pointing straight up. What you did in the second part looks right though.

Thank you!

I've mainly had trouble deciding which way to proceed because I've been comparing the two answers I get (the total from part 1 and the answer from part two). I doubted using x = 1 because then the work for part 1 wouldn't be the same as the work for part 2... I recently came to the conclusion that that is not a fluke, right? If the object were to move diagonally, the force in the y (^j) direction would rely on BOTH x and y thus causing a different work value when compared to taking the route in part 1 (along x-axis then along y-axis)?
 
Chansu said:
Thank you!

I've mainly had trouble deciding which way to proceed because I've been comparing the two answers I get (the total from part 1 and the answer from part two). I doubted using x = 1 because then the work for part 1 wouldn't be the same as the work for part 2... I recently came to the conclusion that that is not a fluke, right? If the object were to move diagonally, the force in the y (^j) direction would rely on BOTH x and y thus causing a different work value when compared to taking the route in part 1 (along x-axis then along y-axis)?
You get the same work along any different routes between two points if the force is conservative. The force in the problem is not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NFuller
ehild said:
You get the same work along any different routes between two points if the force is conservative. The force in the problem is not.

Alright, thank you guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
2K