'F=ma' Physics competition preparation help

AI Thread Summary
To prepare for the F=ma physics competition, it's crucial to start early and familiarize yourself with the exam format. Downloading past exams from the competition's website is recommended to understand the types of problems and time constraints. Practicing with these exams can help identify weaknesses and areas needing improvement. Mastery of AP Physics C is beneficial, as it provides a solid foundation in physics concepts, even though calculus is not heavily emphasized. Memorizing around 20-30 key equations is essential; if you find yourself looking up an equation during practice, it's a sign that you need to commit it to memory. Engaging in practice tests will enhance your readiness and confidence for the competition.
mathisrad
Messages
20
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary: How should I study for the F=ma competition as a total newby to competition physics?

Hi, next year I'm hoping to do the F=ma physics competition. I wanted to start preparing beforehand so Im not too panicked a day before the competition. Does anybody with experience in this competition know any good places to start? Should I just learn AP Physics C well? Or should I look at the competition differently than the school system's way of teaching physics? I know most of Calculus 1 and some Physics but not many of the formulas memorized, I'm also experienced in competition math and science olympiad.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the best preparation is to know what to expect. Go to the F=ma competition site and download one of their actual exams. This one from 2025 has 25 problems to be completed in 75 minutes. Use it as a self-test and see how many you can do within the allotted time. Solutions are provided, but I wouldn't peek if I were you. The idea is to expose your weaknesses under field conditions and see where you need to concentrate your efforts towards improving your performance.

I think that mastery of AP Physics C will be very useful. It seems that calculus is not expected but you should know that rate of change of a parabola is a straight line and conversely when the rate of change of a function is a straight line, the function itself is a parabola.

Also you need to memorize the basic equations that should serve as starting points for constructing your solutions. My guess about their number is 20-30. If you have to look up an equation when you do the self-test, then that is an equation that you need to memorize.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, MatinSAR, berkeman and 1 other person
kuruman said:
I think that the best preparation is to know what to expect. Go to the F=ma competition site and download one of their actual exams. This one from 2025 has 25 problems to be completed in 75 minutes. Use it as a self-test and see how many you can do within the allotted time. Solutions are provided, but I wouldn't peek if I were you. The idea is to expose your weaknesses under field conditions and see where you need to concentrate your efforts towards improving your performance.

I think that mastery of AP Physics C will be very useful. It seems that calculus is not expected but you should know that rate of change of a parabola is a straight line and conversely when the rate of change of a function is a straight line, the function itself is a parabola.

Also you need to memorize the basic equations that should serve as starting points for constructing your solutions. My guess about their number is 20-30. If you have to look up an equation when you do the self-test, then that is an equation that you need to memorize.
Thanks so much, I'll definitely try doing a practice test or two to see what I need to work on
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top