MHB F(x)=ab^{x} where b must be a positive real number

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avalance789
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positive
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the requirement for the base b in the exponential function f(x)=ab^{x} to be a positive real number. Participants explore the implications of using a negative base, noting that it leads to complex numbers, such as when b = -1 and x = 1/2 results in the square root of -1. The consensus is that since complex numbers are not applicable in this context, the base must remain positive and real. This ensures the function behaves predictably and remains within the realm of real numbers. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the transition into complex numbers when the base is not positive.
Avalance789
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Quote: "In mathematics, an exponential function is a function of the form

f(x)=ab^{x}

where b is a POSITIVE REAL number"

Wait. Give me a reason, why exponent base must be positive and real?

What happens if b<0?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Avalance789 said:
Quote: "In mathematics, an exponential function is a function of the form

f(x)=ab^{x}

where b is a POSITIVE REAL number"

Wait. Give me a reason, why exponent base must be positive and real?

What happens if b<0?
What happens if b = -1 and x = 1/2?

-Dan
 
It means sqrt{-1}?

Отправлено с моего SM-A750FN через Tapatalk
 
Avalance789 said:
It means sqrt{-1}?

Отправлено с моего SM-A750FN через Tapatalk
Exactly. And as i is not real number we can't use it for what you seem to be working with.

-Dan
 
Ok, got it. So from this point we get into complex numbers.

Thank you!

Отправлено с моего SM-A750FN через Tapatalk
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top