Factoring Polynomials: A Faster Way!

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factoring Polynomials
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on efficient methods for factoring polynomials, specifically the expression $192x^3-164x^2-270x$. Participants emphasize the importance of identifying common factors, such as $2x$, and utilizing the quadratic formula for the quadratic factor $96x^2-82x-135$. The rational root test is highlighted as a valuable tool for finding potential rational roots, which can streamline the factoring process. Ultimately, the conversation underscores that while factoring polynomials of degree 2 can be straightforward, higher-degree polynomials present increasing complexity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polynomial expressions and their degrees
  • Familiarity with the quadratic formula
  • Knowledge of the rational root test
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the rational root test in polynomial factoring
  • Learn advanced techniques for factoring polynomials of degree 3 and higher
  • Explore the derivation and application of the cubic formula
  • Practice factoring various polynomial expressions using different methods
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and mathematicians interested in enhancing their polynomial factoring skills and understanding the underlying principles of algebraic expressions.

paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I just want to know the faster way to factor the expression. I already factored it out using trial and I am hoping you could give me some tricks to go about it faster than the usual method. Thanks

$192x^3-164x^2-270x$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We see that $2x$ is a factor of all 3 terms, so we may write:

$$2x(96x^2-82x-135)$$

Now, on the quadratic factor, I would use the quadratic formula to determine the roots:

$$x=-\frac{5}{6},\,\frac{27}{16}$$

And since $$96=6\cdot16$$, we can write:

$$2x(6x+5)(16x-27)$$
 
Factoring polynomials is a process fraught with peril, it might be that all our attempts end in failure.

If one assumes (because maybe your instructor has told you so) that a polynomial *does* indeed have a factorization, we can use a tool called "the rational root test", which tells us that any (non-zero) root (and there might not be any) in the rationals is of the form:

$\pm\dfrac{p}{q}$

where $p$ is an integer that divides 135, and $q$ is an integer that divides 96 (because of MarkFL's factoring out the $2x$).

This still leaves several possibilities to be checked out with "trial and error", but it at least cuts down on the sheer number of tries.

The long and short of this is:

with a polynomial of degree 3, "guess and check" for the rational roots is probably the fastest (the "formula" for cubics is pretty nasty),

with a polynomial of degree 2, the quadratic formula is usually your friend (unless you can "see" the factorization at once).

Factoring polynomials of degree 4 is often *very* difficult (unless there's no $x^3$ and $x$ terms), and factoring polynomials of degree 5 is often a lost cause.
 
Hello!

From what MarkFl provided, he used the quadratic formula to find the roots of $96x^2-82x-135$
Since the roots are x = -5/6 and x = 27/16 I am thinking that the factored form of $96x^2-82x-135$
Would be $(x+\frac{5}{6})(x-\frac{27}{16}) = (\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96})$
So the completely factored form of the entire expression could be

$(\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)x}{48})$

I know it is wrong but can you tell me why?
 
You are correct when you state:

$$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)=\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96}$$

However, the LHS is equal to:

$$\frac{96x^2-82x-135}{96}$$

Therefore:

$$96x^2-82x-135=(6x+5)(16x-27)$$

You see for any roots of a quadratic (or any polynomial), there are an infinite number of polynomials having those roots. In the case of the quadratic, let's say it has the roots $r_1,\,r_2$. Then the family of quadratics having those two roots is given by:

$$f(x)=k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$ where $$0\ne k$$

Does that make sense?
 
MarkFL said:
You are correct when you state:

$$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)=\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96}$$

However, the LHS is equal to:

$$\frac{96x^2-82x-135}{96}$$

Therefore:

$$96x^2-82x-135=(6x+5)(16x-27)$$

You see for any roots of a quadratic (or any polynomial), there are an infinite number of polynomials having those roots. In the case of the quadratic, let's say it has the roots $r_1,\,r_2$. Then the family of quadratics having those two roots is given by:

$$f(x)=k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$ where $$0\ne k$$

Does that make sense?

Hello!
From what I understand when you know the roots of a certain polynomial we can use those roots to get the factored form a that polynomial.
Is the expression $$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)$$ equivalent to $96x^2-82x-135$? And if it is how do we transform it to $96x^2-82x-135$

Please bear with me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K