MHB Factoring Polynomials: A Faster Way!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on efficient methods for factoring polynomials, particularly the expression $192x^3-164x^2-270x$. Participants highlight the importance of identifying common factors, as seen with $2x$, and using the quadratic formula for the resulting quadratic factor. The rational root test is recommended to narrow down potential roots, although trial and error remains a common approach, especially for cubic polynomials. Clarifications are made regarding the relationship between roots and their corresponding polynomial forms, emphasizing that multiple polynomials can share the same roots. Understanding these concepts is crucial for successfully factoring polynomials of varying degrees.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I just want to know the faster way to factor the expression. I already factored it out using trial and I am hoping you could give me some tricks to go about it faster than the usual method. Thanks

$192x^3-164x^2-270x$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We see that $2x$ is a factor of all 3 terms, so we may write:

$$2x(96x^2-82x-135)$$

Now, on the quadratic factor, I would use the quadratic formula to determine the roots:

$$x=-\frac{5}{6},\,\frac{27}{16}$$

And since $$96=6\cdot16$$, we can write:

$$2x(6x+5)(16x-27)$$
 
Factoring polynomials is a process fraught with peril, it might be that all our attempts end in failure.

If one assumes (because maybe your instructor has told you so) that a polynomial *does* indeed have a factorization, we can use a tool called "the rational root test", which tells us that any (non-zero) root (and there might not be any) in the rationals is of the form:

$\pm\dfrac{p}{q}$

where $p$ is an integer that divides 135, and $q$ is an integer that divides 96 (because of MarkFL's factoring out the $2x$).

This still leaves several possibilities to be checked out with "trial and error", but it at least cuts down on the sheer number of tries.

The long and short of this is:

with a polynomial of degree 3, "guess and check" for the rational roots is probably the fastest (the "formula" for cubics is pretty nasty),

with a polynomial of degree 2, the quadratic formula is usually your friend (unless you can "see" the factorization at once).

Factoring polynomials of degree 4 is often *very* difficult (unless there's no $x^3$ and $x$ terms), and factoring polynomials of degree 5 is often a lost cause.
 
Hello!

From what MarkFl provided, he used the quadratic formula to find the roots of $96x^2-82x-135$
Since the roots are x = -5/6 and x = 27/16 I am thinking that the factored form of $96x^2-82x-135$
Would be $(x+\frac{5}{6})(x-\frac{27}{16}) = (\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96})$
So the completely factored form of the entire expression could be

$(\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)x}{48})$

I know it is wrong but can you tell me why?
 
You are correct when you state:

$$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)=\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96}$$

However, the LHS is equal to:

$$\frac{96x^2-82x-135}{96}$$

Therefore:

$$96x^2-82x-135=(6x+5)(16x-27)$$

You see for any roots of a quadratic (or any polynomial), there are an infinite number of polynomials having those roots. In the case of the quadratic, let's say it has the roots $r_1,\,r_2$. Then the family of quadratics having those two roots is given by:

$$f(x)=k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$ where $$0\ne k$$

Does that make sense?
 
MarkFL said:
You are correct when you state:

$$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)=\frac{(6x+5)(16x-27)}{96}$$

However, the LHS is equal to:

$$\frac{96x^2-82x-135}{96}$$

Therefore:

$$96x^2-82x-135=(6x+5)(16x-27)$$

You see for any roots of a quadratic (or any polynomial), there are an infinite number of polynomials having those roots. In the case of the quadratic, let's say it has the roots $r_1,\,r_2$. Then the family of quadratics having those two roots is given by:

$$f(x)=k(x-r_1)(x-r_2)$$ where $$0\ne k$$

Does that make sense?

Hello!
From what I understand when you know the roots of a certain polynomial we can use those roots to get the factored form a that polynomial.
Is the expression $$\left(x+\frac{5}{6}\right)\left(x-\frac{27}{16}\right)$$ equivalent to $96x^2-82x-135$? And if it is how do we transform it to $96x^2-82x-135$

Please bear with me.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top