Factoring polynomials in general

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the intuitive understanding of factoring polynomials, specifically focusing on the quadratic expression x^2 + 5x - 14. Participants explore methods for decomposing this polynomial into its factors without the aid of a calculator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for factoring, including trial and error, and the use of integer combinations that yield the constant term. Questions about the effectiveness of these methods and whether there are simpler formulas or techniques are raised.

Discussion Status

Some participants have shared insights on using trial and error, while others suggest that practice can lead to quicker recognition of factors. There is mention of the quadratic formula as an alternative method, and the conversation includes considerations of integer coefficients and the limitations of factoring certain polynomials.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that not all polynomials can be factored with integer coefficients, leading to discussions about alternative methods such as completing the square or using solutions to find factors.

beaf123
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




I was wondering how people intuitively see how to decompose functions?

For example:

x^2 + 5x - 14, how do you solve that to be (x+7)(x-2) without a calculator?

Do you use a specific method or do you just sit for a while trying and failing?

The question is a bit stupid, but were wondering if there is a formula or a simple method that I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beaf123 said:

Homework Statement

I was wondering how people intuitively see how to decompose functions?

For example:

x^2 + 5x - 14, how do you solve that to be (x+7)(x-2) without a calculator?

Do you use a specific method or do you just sit for a while trying and failing?

The question is a bit stupid, but were wondering if there is a formula or a simple method that I am missing?

It's trial and error really, but with some practice you can do it within seconds. Or, if you're willing to put a little more effort in, you'll get the answer without having to resort to trial and error.

Ok, with the trial and error method -
If you expand the factored form, you'll get [tex](x+7)(x-2) = x^2-2x+7x-7*2[/tex] by the FOIL method. Notice 7*2 = 14, but I purposely wrote it that way. So it's clear that we want our quadratic to be of the form (x+a)(x+b) where a*b is equal to the constant term, in this case, -14. Now, the only integers that multiply together to get -14 are
-1 and 14
1 and -14
-2 and 7
2 and -7

So how do we know which combination to use? It all comes down to what the coefficient of x is, in our case, 5. So which combination from the options add together to give 5? That would be 7 and -2, so that is the combination we use.

The method without trial and error would be to use the quadratic formula. There's heaps of that on the internet that you can read about.
 
beaf123 said:

Homework Statement




I was wondering how people intuitively see how to decompose functions?

For example:

x^2 + 5x - 14, how do you solve that to be (x+7)(x-2) without a calculator?

Do you use a specific method or do you just sit for a while trying and failing?

The question is a bit stupid, but were wondering if there is a formula or a simple method that I am missing?
One way is to assume there's a nice factorisation and try a few values.
In the above, try x=1 - no, that gives -8; for sufficiently large x it will be positive, so must be a root > 1. Try 3 - no that gives +10, so ...
 
Typically, when we say "factor" we mean "separate into factors with integer coefficients". (x+ a)(x+ b)= x2+ (a+b)x+ ab so, in the case you give we observe that 14 can only be factored as (1)(14) or (2)(7). Neither 1+ 14 nor 1- 14 gives 5 but 7- 2= 5 so it must be (x- 2)(x+ 7) with "+" or "-" chosen to give the correct signs.

Of course, "almost all" polynomials cannot be factored with integer coefficients. In that case, the best we can do is set the polynomial equal to 0, solve the equation in some other way and then use the solutions to find the factors. For example, to try to factor [itex]x^2- 8x+ 3[/itex] we first observe that "3" can only be factored as (1)(3) (3 is prime) and that none of 1+ 3, 1- 3, -1+ 3, -1- 3 will give -8. But we can "complete the square" to see that [itex]x^2- 8x+ 3= x^2- 8x+ 16- 16+ 3= (x- 4)^2- 13[/itex] so that the solutions to [tex]x^2- 8x+ 3= 0[/tex] are [itex]4+\sqrt{13}[/itex] and [itex]4- \sqrt{3}[/itex] so that [itex]x^2- 8x+ 3= (x- 4- \sqrt{13})(x- 4+ \sqrt{13})[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K