Undergrad Factorization of a matrix equation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the factorization of the equation A\vec{x} - 7\vec{x} = \vec{0}, clarifying that the correct form is (A - 7I)\vec{x} = \vec{0} rather than (A - 7)\vec{x} = \vec{0}. The confusion arises from interpreting the scalar 7 as a linear operator, which necessitates the inclusion of the identity matrix I for proper mathematical representation. While the notation (A - 7)\vec{x} is sometimes used for brevity, it is considered an abuse of notation since it implies subtracting a scalar from a matrix. The consensus is that standard linear algebra texts consistently use (A - 7I)x to avoid ambiguity and clarify the mathematical operations involved. Proper notation is essential to maintain clarity in linear algebra expressions.
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
This might be a dumb question, but I am wondering, given the equation ##A\vec{x} - 7\vec{x} = \vec{0}##, the factorization ##(A - 7I)\vec{x} = \vec{0}## is correct rather than the factorization ##(A - 7)\vec{x} = \vec{0}##. It seems that I can discribute just fine to get the equation we had before using the second ##(A - 7)\vec{x} = \vec{0}##, so I'm not sure why I would think to do ##(A - 7)\vec{x} = \vec{0}## rather than ##(A - 7I)\vec{x} = \vec{0}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes you are right that that is the strictly correct way to write it. However the slight abuse of notation ##(A-7)\vec x## is sometimes used, because it is shorter to write and it is usually clear what it means. In that case the symbol 7 is interpreted to mean the operator on the vector space ##V## that maps ##\vec v## to ##7\vec v##.
 
andrewkirk said:
Yes you are right that that is the strictly correct way to write it. However the slight abuse of notation ##(A-7)\vec x## is sometimes used, because it is shorter to write and it is usually clear what it means. In that case the symbol 7 is interpreted to mean the operator on the vector space ##V## that maps ##\vec v## to ##7\vec v##.
Actually, a better question that I might ask would be that since in ##A\vec{x} - 7\vec{x} = \vec{0}## we have a matrix times and vector and then a scalar times a vector, what allows us to be able to factor out the vector? Wouldn't we get a matrix minus a scalar?
 
No, because there is no rule that allows us to do that factorisation. It can only be factorised if we interpret the 7 as a linear operator, meaning it is ##7I##.
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Actually, a better question that I might ask would be that since in ##A\vec{x} - 7\vec{x} = \vec{0}## we have a matrix times and vector and then a scalar times a vector, what allows us to be able to factor out the vector? Wouldn't we get a matrix minus a scalar?
Which is why you need to append I in the factorization.
In the expression ##A\vec{x} - 7\vec{x}## Ax is a vector and 7x is a vector, but if you factor the left side to (A - 7), then you're subtracting a scalar from a matrix. As you note, this doesn't make sense unless we stretch things to interpret 7 in the way that andrewkirk mentions. In this case 7 is really 7I.
 
Why are we allowed to interpret 7 as either a scalar 7 or a matrix 7I? It seems somewhat ambiguous
 
Mr Davis 97 said:
Why are we allowed to interpret 7 as either a scalar 7 or a matrix 7I? It seems somewhat ambiguous
As andrewkirk said in post #2, this is an abuse of notation, but when it is used, the context usually makes it clear what is intended.

However, every linear algebra book I've seen will write the factorization of Ax - 7x (for example) as (A - 7I)x, to show explicitly that we're not subtracting a scalar from a matrix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K