abhishek
- 36
- 0
Wow, when I checked this thread yesterday I hoped it'd die out quietly. Now it's up to four pages.
<heresy>
This thread stirred more embarrassment than pride in me. I was really frightened of this kind of groupthink even when I was a kid in school in India.
One of the interesting phenomena that I was exposed to was how iconic figures involved in the independence movement became idolised, almost to the extent of pop stars. The tragedy here is that many of the important values these people stood for are forgotten (there is no warts-and-all approach). For example, (this gets on my nerves a lot) neither the textbooks nor teachers at my very-religious school cared to mention Nehru was an atheist.
Although much of Indian society respects individual autonomy, Indian nationalism tends to take this away from people who are deemed worthy of national pride. I might feel slightly proud if I heard Vinod Khosla, Vinod Dahm, or Rajiv Gupta say something nice about India; I feel no pride if 'Biology' claims them on India's behalf.
When 3.22 million Indians have to move to the US to put themselves to good use, that says nothing nice about India. It is hardly a matter of pride that they feel unable to perform and get deserving returns in India. Now don't pin this solely on politicians -- I'm sure there's a lot more at work here.
I'd better cut myself off right here, before I fan any more flames.
</heresy>
Don't get me wrong, there are many things that can make me proud of India; just like many things that can make me proud of humanity in general, or any given subset thereof. What I dislike is the single-minded nationalistic view -- bordering on inverse racism -- that is prevalent in India. Is it not possible to "work towards the welfare of India" rationally and without all the drama?
<heresy>
This thread stirred more embarrassment than pride in me. I was really frightened of this kind of groupthink even when I was a kid in school in India.
One of the interesting phenomena that I was exposed to was how iconic figures involved in the independence movement became idolised, almost to the extent of pop stars. The tragedy here is that many of the important values these people stood for are forgotten (there is no warts-and-all approach). For example, (this gets on my nerves a lot) neither the textbooks nor teachers at my very-religious school cared to mention Nehru was an atheist.
Although much of Indian society respects individual autonomy, Indian nationalism tends to take this away from people who are deemed worthy of national pride. I might feel slightly proud if I heard Vinod Khosla, Vinod Dahm, or Rajiv Gupta say something nice about India; I feel no pride if 'Biology' claims them on India's behalf.
When 3.22 million Indians have to move to the US to put themselves to good use, that says nothing nice about India. It is hardly a matter of pride that they feel unable to perform and get deserving returns in India. Now don't pin this solely on politicians -- I'm sure there's a lot more at work here.
I'd better cut myself off right here, before I fan any more flames.
</heresy>
Don't get me wrong, there are many things that can make me proud of India; just like many things that can make me proud of humanity in general, or any given subset thereof. What I dislike is the single-minded nationalistic view -- bordering on inverse racism -- that is prevalent in India. Is it not possible to "work towards the welfare of India" rationally and without all the drama?